Обсуждение: [GENERAL] Why is this functional index not used?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

[GENERAL] Why is this functional index not used?

От
"Klaus P. Pieper"
Дата:

Given a country table and an order table:

 

CREATE TABLE g.country

(

-- inherited from table g.standard:  oid uuid NOT NULL,

-- … some more columns inherited…

  lisocode integer NOT NULL, -- Numeric ISO 3166 code

  szisoalpha2 character varying(2), -- The 2 letter country code

  szisoalpha3 character varying(3), -- The 3 letter country code

  szisonum3 character varying(3), -- The NUMERIC country code with leading zeros

-- a few more columns here

CONSTRAINT country_pkey PRIMARY KEY (oid)

) INHERITS (g.standard)

WITH (

  OIDS=FALSE

);

 

This table is filled with ISO 3166 country codes.

 

The order table:

 

CREATE TABLE t."order"

(

-- inherited from table g.standard:  oid uuid NOT NULL,

-- … some more columns inherited…

  szxmladdress text,

-- many more columns in this table

CONSTRAINT country_pkey PRIMARY KEY (oid)

) INHERITS (g.standard)

WITH (

  OIDS=FALSE

);

 

 

A typical entry in t."order".szxmladdress looks like

 

<address entityType="Person" country="DE">

  <field name="Address.oid">ae0eb84f-9b8b-4fef-b87a-d6757bdfeaf9</field>

  <field name="Address.uaddrtyperef">0bbdb48c-21c7-429e-944e-59a4d9ace9d5</field>

  <field name="Address.szstreet">Hauptstraße</field>

  <!—some more xml tags here -->

</address>

 

No XML field in the order table exceeds 2kB.

 

Getting the 2 letter country code from the xml address by this function:

 

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION g.getxmladdresscountryid(xaddr text)

  RETURNS uuid AS

$BODY$BEGIN

        RETURN (SELECT oID FROM G.Country WHERE szIsoAlpha2 = array_to_string(xpath('/address/@country', xAddr::xml), '') ORDER BY lIsoCode LIMIT 1);

END$BODY$

  LANGUAGE plpgsql IMMUTABLE;

 

I know that this function is not really IMMUTABLE but the country table is changing only every several years.

 

Created a functional index on the order table:

 

CREATE INDEX order_getxmladdresscountryid_fidx

  ON t."order"

  USING btree

  (g.getxmladdresscountryid(szxmladdress));

 

Joining order and country table limiting to 10 rows uses the index:

 

explain analyse

SELECT

GCountry.szISOAlpha2,

GCountry.szISOAlpha3,

GCountry.szISONum3

from

t.order torder

left join G.Country GCountry ON G.GetXmlAddressCountryID(TOrder.szXmlAddress) = GCountry.oID

limit 10

 

Gives:

 

Limit  (cost=0.56..8.45 rows=10 width=11) (actual time=0.644..4.764 rows=10 loops=1)

  ->  Merge Right Join  (cost=0.56..10670.45 rows=13517 width=11) (actual time=0.642..4.754 rows=10 loops=1)

        Merge Cond: (gcountry.oid = g.getxmladdresscountryid(torder.szxmladdress))

        ->  Index Scan using country_pkey on country gcountry  (cost=0.27..38.05 rows=258 width=27) (actual time=0.025..0.067 rows=32 loops=1)

        ->  Index Scan using order_getxmladdresscountryid_fidx on "order" torder  (cost=0.29..7019.04 rows=13517 width=366) (actual time=0.020..0.058 rows=10 loops=1)

Planning time: 0.603 ms

Execution time: 4.898 ms

 

But when I remove the “limit 10”, the index is no longer used:

 

Hash Left Join  (cost=17.81..5397.46 rows=13517 width=11) (actual time=0.941..4721.372 rows=13510 loops=1)

  Hash Cond: (g.getxmladdresscountryid(torder.szxmladdress) = gcountry.oid)

  ->  Seq Scan on "order" torder  (cost=0.00..3504.17 rows=13517 width=366) (actual time=0.011..27.542 rows=13510 loops=1)

  ->  Hash  (cost=14.58..14.58 rows=258 width=27) (actual time=0.427..0.427 rows=258 loops=1)

        Buckets: 1024  Batches: 1  Memory Usage: 23kB

        ->  Seq Scan on country gcountry  (cost=0.00..14.58 rows=258 width=27) (actual time=0.008..0.226 rows=258 loops=1)

Planning time: 0.580 ms

Execution time: 4728.602 ms

 

4.8 seconds - I would expect a much faster query using a functional index.

 

Even a “limit 100”  does not use the index any more.

 

Just a side note: without “limit 10” the query needs 4728 ms - almost a linear increase from 10 rows to 13500 rows.

 

I played around with COST of the function between 1 and 20000 and with several options on postgresql.conf without luck.

 

A sequential scan on the order table alone is carried out in 15 ms.

 

Thanks for any idea.

 

Klaus

 

 

 

 

Re: [GENERAL] Why is this functional index not used?

От
"Klaus P. Pieper"
Дата:

I played around with COST up to 999999 – still no improvement.

 

HOWEVER – I determined that more than 95% of the records in the database are local addresses and the indexed function returns NULL.

This seems to create an issue with LEFT JOIN.

 

Increasing the COST of the function to 20000 and rewriting the query as follows provides a significantly better result:

 

explain analyse

SELECT

GCountry.szISOAlpha2,

GCountry.szISOAlpha3,

GCountry.szISONum3

from

t.order torder

join G.Country GCountry ON G.GetXmlAddressCountryID(TOrder.szXmlAddress) = GCountry.oID

UNION ALL

SELECT

'XX'::TEXT, -- can use NULL::TEXT with no difference

'XXX'::TEXT, -- can use NULL::TEXT with no difference

'999'::TEXT -- can use NULL::TEXT with no difference

from

t.order torder

WHERE G.GetXmlAddressCountryID(TOrder.szXmlAddress) IS NULL

 

Gives:

 

Append  (cost=0.29..7661.82 rows=13578 width=11) (actual time=0.106..20.464 rows=13510 loops=1)

  ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.29..7386.57 rows=13510 width=11) (actual time=0.104..1.235 rows=73 loops=1)

        ->  Seq Scan on country gcountry  (cost=0.00..14.58 rows=258 width=27) (actual time=0.012..0.126 rows=258 loops=1)

        ->  Index Scan using order_getxmladdresscountryid_fidx on "order" torder  (cost=0.29..27.89 rows=68 width=366) (actual time=0.003..0.003 rows=0 loops=258)

              Index Cond: (g.getxmladdresscountryid(szxmladdress) = gcountry.oid)

  ->  Index Scan using order_getxmladdresscountryid_fidx on "order" torder_1  (cost=0.29..139.47 rows=68 width=0) (actual time=0.013..12.840 rows=13437 loops=1)

        Index Cond: (g.getxmladdresscountryid(szxmladdress) IS NULL)

Planning time: 1.104 ms

Execution time: 23.607 ms

 

A similar result was achieved by return a dummy ID from the function for records without country.

 

Any idea why the functional index does not work in a LEFT JOIN query?

 

Thanks Klaus

 

 

Von: Jeff Janes [mailto:jeff.janes@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21.
März 2017 08:22
An: Klaus P. Pieper
Betreff: Re: [GENERAL] Why is this functional index not used?

 

On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Klaus P. Pieper <kpi6288@gmail.com> wrote:

 

I played around with COST of the function between 1 and 20000 and with several options on postgresql.conf without luck.

 

Why not more than 20000 ?   The true value could be much higher than that.

 

Cheers,

 

Jeff