Обсуждение: [HACKERS] proposal: enhanced stack trace for PL - print param args

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

[HACKERS] proposal: enhanced stack trace for PL - print param args

От
Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Hi

In last discussion related to PLpgSQL was mentioned weak of stack trace PLpgSQL. The function parameters are not printed. 

CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.foo(a double precision, b double precision)
 RETURNS double precision
 LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $function$
begin
  return 100/a;
end;
$function$

Current:

postgres=# select foo(0, 100);
ERROR:  division by zero
CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function foo(double precision) line 3 at RETURN

Proposed result:
postgres=# select foo(0, 100);
ERROR:  division by zero
CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function foo(double precision) line 3 at RETURN
ARGUMENTS: a=0, b=100

* only function parameters are printed - no local parameters
* the line of arguments will be limited - X chars ?
* the content of variable should be limited - X chars ? - maybe 40 chars

This function can has impact on performance - so it should be explicitly enabled with some GUC - like extra_back_trace or some similar. Probably before any call the function parameters and related out functions should be copied to safe memory context. More it can increase press on Error Memory Context and possibly on log size.

Is a interest about this feature? Comments, notes?

Regards

Pavel 

Re: [HACKERS] proposal: enhanced stack trace for PL - print param args

От
Corey Huinker
Дата:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi

Proposed result:
postgres=# select foo(0, 100);
ERROR:  division by zero
CONTEXT:  PL/pgSQL function foo(double precision) line 3 at RETURN
ARGUMENTS: a=0, b=100

+1 This would be useful in cases where an app calls one procedure and then disconnects. It's hard to know which of the thousands of invocations caused the error.
 

* only function parameters are printed - no local parameters

+1, we'd have no insight into variables inside the function anyway.
 
* the line of arguments will be limited - X chars ?

+1
 
* the content of variable should be limited - X chars ? - maybe 40 chars

This function can has impact on performance - so it should be explicitly enabled with some GUC - like extra_back_trace or some similar. Probably before any call the function parameters and related out functions should be copied to safe memory context. More it can increase press on Error Memory Context and possibly on log size.

func_args_back_trace?