Обсуждение: INSERT ON CONFLICT of "wide" table: target lists can have at most 1664 entries

Our application INSERTs data from external sources, and infrequently UPDATEs
the previously-inserted data (currently, it first SELECTs to determine whether
to UPDATE).

I'm implementing unique indices to allow "upsert" (and pg_repack and..), but
running into a problem when the table has >830 columns (we have some tables
which are at the 1600 column limit, and have previously worked around that
limit using arrays or multiple tables).

I tried to work around the upsert problem by using pygresql inline=True
(instead of default PREPAREd statements) but both have the same issue.

I created a test script which demonstrates the problem (attached).

It seems to me that there's currently no way to "upsert" such a wide table?

I see:
./src/include/access/htup_details.h:#define MaxTupleAttributeNumber 1664        /* 8 * 208 */

./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c-      /*
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c-       * Check that we did not produce too many resnos; at the very least we
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c-       * cannot allow more than 2^16, since that would exceed the range of a
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c:       * AttrNumber. It seems safest to use MaxTupleAttributeNumber.
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c-       */
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c:      if (pstate->p_next_resno - 1 > MaxTupleAttributeNumber)
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c-              ereport(ERROR,
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c-                              (errcode(ERRCODE_PROGRAM_LIMIT_EXCEEDED),
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c:                               errmsg("target lists can have at most %d entries",
./src/backend/parser/parse_node.c:                                              MaxTupleAttributeNumber)));

Thanks in advance for any suggestions.

Justin

> On Dec 4, 2016, at 9:32 AM, Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> wrote:
>
> Our application INSERTs data from external sources, and infrequently UPDATEs
> the previously-inserted data (currently, it first SELECTs to determine whether
> to UPDATE).
>
> I'm implementing unique indices to allow "upsert" (and pg_repack and..), but
> running into a problem when the table has >830 columns (we have some tables
> which are at the 1600 column limit, and have previously worked around that
> limit using arrays or multiple tables).
>
> I tried to work around the upsert problem by using pygresql inline=True
> (instead of default PREPAREd statements) but both have the same issue.
>
> I created a test script which demonstrates the problem (attached).
>
> It seems to me that there's currently no way to "upsert" such a wide table?

Pardon my intrusion here, but I'm really curious what sort of datum has so many attributes?

Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> I'm implementing unique indices to allow "upsert" (and pg_repack and..), but
> running into a problem when the table has >830 columns (we have some tables
> which are at the 1600 column limit, and have previously worked around that
> limit using arrays or multiple tables).

Yeah, this is a bug, but fortunately the fix is pretty trivial.  See

https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=da05d0ebc637a84ba41a172b32552557ebad199f

            regards, tom lane