Обсуждение: Can't get all search results
I can't get all May 2006 search results to show up on:
http://archives.postgresql.org/
If I search for "semaphore", I see only one entry for May 2006, while
this shows three emails with that title from the patches list for May
7-8, 2006:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/index.php
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I can't get all May 2006 search results to show up on: because indexes were created offline. Our mailware should be always in sync http://pgsql.ru/db/mw/index.html?section=-1&word=semaphore&action=Search&sdb_d=11&sdb_m=4&sdb_y=2006&sde_d=11&sde_m=5&sde_y=2006&weight=0&format=0&order=1 We have not enough time to upgrade tsearch2 on this server to make it pretty fast, but it's still usable. > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ > > If I search for "semaphore", I see only one entry for May 2006, while > this shows three emails with that title from the patches list for May > 7-8, 2006: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/index.php > > Regards, Oleg _____________________________________________________________ Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru), Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia Internet: oleg@sai.msu.su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/ phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 22:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I can't get all May 2006 search results to show up on: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ > > If I search for "semaphore", I see only one entry for May 2006, while > this shows three emails with that title from the patches list for May > 7-8, 2006: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/index.php > Aye, I'm aware of a problem with the sort by date functionality,... if you look closer you will see that they appear among the last few results. ... John
John Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 22:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I can't get all May 2006 search results to show up on: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ > > > > If I search for "semaphore", I see only one entry for May 2006, while > > this shows three emails with that title from the patches list for May > > 7-8, 2006: > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/index.php > > > > Aye, I'm aware of a problem with the sort by date functionality,... if > you look closer you will see that they appear among the last few > results. Oh, I definately see some strange date ordering on the last page. Can you explain how something as simple as a date sort could not work 100%? -- Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 09:01 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > John Hansen wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 22:12 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > I can't get all May 2006 search results to show up on: > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/ > > > > > > If I search for "semaphore", I see only one entry for May 2006, while > > > this shows three emails with that title from the patches list for May > > > 7-8, 2006: > > > > > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/index.php > > > > > > > Aye, I'm aware of a problem with the sort by date functionality,... if > > you look closer you will see that they appear among the last few > > results. > > Oh, I definately see some strange date ordering on the last page. Can > you explain how something as simple as a date sort could not work 100%? Sure, the function that converts the webserver's response (the last_modified header returned by a HEAD request to be precise) to a unix timestamp, is by nature, somewhat uhmm,. unstable 'by nature' since there is no standard, an attempt has been made to cover the most common response formats. ... John