Обсуждение: Backslash characters in PLPGSQL
We recently upgraded from 8.3 to 8.4 and are noticing a change in behavior that we can’t seem to associate with a particular server setting.
In 8.3, the following compiles and works perfectly:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION test_function2(tText TEXT) RETURNS TEXT AS
$BODY$
BEGIN
--
RETURN REPLACE(tText,'\','\\');
END;
$BODY$
LANGUAGE 'plpgsql' VOLATILE;
SELECT test_function2('Bob\');
test_function2
text
"BOB\\"
However, in 8.4, attempting to save the same function results in:
ERROR: unterminated string
CONTEXT: compile of PL/pgSQL function "test_function2" near line 3
It’s clear that it’s interpreting the backslashes as escaping the following quote characters, as it compiles and works correctly if I put a space between the slash and the quote character.
Escaping the backslash with another backslash, with or without the E character at the start of the string, doesn’t resolve anything. In fact, escaping the backslash like so:
RETURN REPLACE(tText,'\\','\\\\');
Works perfectly…to replace two backslashes:
SELECT test_function2('Bob\');
test_function2
text
"BOB\"
SELECT test_function2('Bob\\');
test_function2
text
"BOB\\\\"
I’ve checked the only two server config settings that would appear to impact this:
standard_conforming_strings (set to ON)
backslash_quote (set to SAFE_ENCODING)
Changing the server setting doesn’t appear to have an impact. Does anybody have a suggestion on what I’m missing?
Garrett Murphy
"Garrett Murphy" <gmurphy@lawlogix.com> writes: > We recently upgraded from 8.3 to 8.4 and are noticing a change in > behavior that we can't seem to associate with a particular server > setting. I think you're seeing the effects of this 8.4 patch: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2009-04/msg00216.php in particular: * In standard_conforming_strings mode, backslash as the last character of a non-E string literal is now correctly taken asan ordinary character; formerly it was misinterpreted as escaping the ending quote. (Since the string also had to passthrough the core scanner, this invariably led to syntax errors.) However, as I wrote there, I was under the impression that this fix didn't break any cases that actually worked usefully before 8.4. I tried your example and as far as I can tell, 8.3.x fails on test_function2(), giving "unterminated string" with or without standard_conforming_strings set. But 8.4 accepts it, if you have standard_conforming_strings set. I wonder whether your actual function has yet another improperly terminated string on another line, thereby allowing the 8.3 plpgsql scanner to get back into sync. But it's not obvious why that wouldn't lead to visible misbehavior, or why 8.4 would not like it. regards, tom lane