Обсуждение: Knowing new item in table...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Knowing new item in table...

От
"macky"
Дата:
im still in the dark when it comes to postgres..... is there a way i can
know if there was a new entry on a table...

scenario...

  i have a script that runs every 5 minutes... that script checks if there's
a new entry in that table... and if YES there's a new entry ill do some
processing...


is there an internal utility that i can use in postgres that can tell me
that this rows a new commers... hehehe....


if someone has other ideas on how to deal with this speak out...

thanks in advance......

btw..
   my idea is that that table will have an addtional column as reference
lets say column "READ" 1 for yes 0 for NO





Re: Knowing new item in table...

От
Christopher Sawtell
Дата:
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 20:26, macky wrote:
> im still in the dark when it comes to postgres..... is there a way i can
> know if there was a new entry on a table...
>
> scenario...
>
>   i have a script that runs every 5 minutes... that script checks if
> there's a new entry in that table... and if YES there's a new entry ill do
> some processing...
>
>
> is there an internal utility that i can use in postgres that can tell me
> that this rows a new commers... hehehe....
>
>
> if someone has other ideas on how to deal with this speak out...

Here's mine:

Make sure the tables you wish to check have an id field of type SERIAL.
Then check the last entry number in the associated sequence when you wish to 
check for new entries.

That will tell you if there are any new entries.


-- 
Sincerely etc.,
NAME       Christopher SawtellCELL PHONE 021 257 4451ICQ UIN    45863470EMAIL      csawtell @ paradise . net . nzCNOTES
   ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/C/tutorials/sawtell_C.tar.gz
 
-> Please refrain from using HTML or WORD attachments in e-mails to me <-



Re: [NOVICE] Knowing new item in table...

От
Jason Earl
Дата:
--- macky <macky@edsamail.com> wrote:
> im still in the dark when it comes to postgres.....
> is there a way i can
> know if there was a new entry on a table...

That's a pretty common problem.

> scenario...
>
>   i have a script that runs every 5 minutes... that
> script checks if there's
> a new entry in that table... and if YES there's a
> new entry ill do some
> processing...

Probably the most straightforward thing to do is to
simply insert a timestamp in each row as it is added
to the database.  That way you can do a simple select
to figure out which rows have been added:

SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE insert_time > now() - '5
minutes'::interval

or alternatively

SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE insert_time > '2001-08-03
11:30'

The best part is that creating a column that includes
a timestamp automagically is fairly easy to do.
Simply define your table like this:

CREATE TABLE foo (
insert_time     timestamp DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
name            text
);

Once your table is created you simply insert into
table foo ignoring the insert_time column like so:

INSERT INTO foo (name) VALUES ('Jason');

and your timestamp automagically gets inserted:

processdata=> SELECT * FROM foo;
     insert_time        | name
------------------------+-------
 2001-08-03 11:32:48-06 | Jason
(1 row)

Pretty neat, huh?

> is there an internal utility that i can use in
> postgres that can tell me
> that this rows a new commers... hehehe....

Nope, you have to come up with the logic yourself.
However, PostgreSQL has all kinds of tools that are
really helpful.

> if someone has other ideas on how to deal with this
> speak out...
>
> thanks in advance......
>
> btw..
>    my idea is that that table will have an addtional
> column as reference
> lets say column "READ" 1 for yes 0 for NO
>

That would work too, but it would be a lot harder.
For example, you would have to first select all the
rows where READ is 0, do your processing, and then
update all of those rows to 1.  You would almost
certainly want to do all of this in a transaction so
that you could roll READ back to 0 if something went
wrong, and you would probably want to lock the table
to boot as you would have to worry about your
processing step taking more than 5 minutes.  If it
did, the second transaction would see the last 10
minutes of of inserts as being unread even though the
first transaction was still working on them.

I hope this is helpful,
Jason


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger
http://phonecard.yahoo.com/