Обсуждение: Packaging PostGIS for F23 / PG95

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Packaging PostGIS for F23 / PG95

От
Oskari Saarenmaa
Дата:
Hi,

I noticed PostGIS wasn't available for F23 / PG95 in yum.postgresql.org
and looked into the issues.  Apparently SFCGAL 1.2.0 didn't build on F23
due to a change in CGAL, upstream fixed this in release 1.2.2 so I just
downloaded the latest tag from github and updated the spec to match,
attached.

After fixing that I ran into issues building PostGIS on F23 wrt linking
to GDAL.  That required adding a -fPIC flag to configure when linking
with GDAL as well as removing the LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting in .spec.
Attached patches for .spec and for PostGIS's configure.

Cheers,
Oskari
Вложения

Re: Packaging PostGIS for F23 / PG95

От
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Дата:
Hi,

Thanks for the patch! I applied these, and I'm working on the builds
right now.

Regards, Devrim

On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 10:24 +0200, Oskari Saarenmaa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed PostGIS wasn't available for F23 / PG95 in
> yum.postgresql.org
> and looked into the issues.  Apparently SFCGAL 1.2.0 didn't build on
> F23
> due to a change in CGAL, upstream fixed this in release 1.2.2 so I
> just
> downloaded the latest tag from github and updated the spec to match,
> attached.
>
> After fixing that I ran into issues building PostGIS on F23 wrt
> linking
> to GDAL.  That required adding a -fPIC flag to configure when linking
> with GDAL as well as removing the LD_LIBRARY_PATH setting in .spec.
> Attached patches for .spec and for PostGIS's configure.
>
> Cheers,
> Oskari

--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
Twitter: @DevrimGunduz , @DevrimGunduzTR
Вложения