Обсуждение: query planner and scanning methods

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

query planner and scanning methods

От
Colin Copeland
Дата:
Hello,

I'm running into performance issues with various queries on a
PostgreSQL database (of books).  I'm having trouble understanding the
thinking behind the query planner in this scenario:
http://dpaste.com/hold/80101/
(also attached at bottom of email)

Relation sizes:
dimension_books: 1998766 rows
dimension_library_books: 10397943 rows
Version: PostgreSQL 8.3.3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC cc
(GCC) 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)

Why does the query planner change when adding OFFSET?  Is there a way
to force it to use the first plan?  The second plan is relatively
slower than the first.  I've run ANALYZE recently and played around
with different sets of indexes, but I believe my knowledge here is
limited.

count() is equally as slow (SELECT count(DISTINCT
"dimension_book"."call")...).  Eventually I want to paginate the
results, kind of like the PostgreSQL Archive search:

Results 1-20 of more than 1000.
Searching in 706,529 pages took 0.13221 seconds.
Result pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... Next

I assume it implements something something along these lines?

Thanks,
   colin

/******************************************************
                            Table "public.dimension_library_books"
    Column   |  Type   |                              Modifiers
------------+---------
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
  id         | integer | not null default
nextval('dimension_library_books_id_seq'::regclass)
  book_id    | integer | not null
  library_id | integer | not null
Indexes:
     "dimension_library_books_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
     "dimension_library_books_book_id" btree (book_id)
     "dimension_library_books_library_id" btree (library_id)
Foreign-key constraints:
     "dimension_library_books_book_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY (book_id)
REFERENCES dimension_book(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED
     "dimension_library_books_library_id_fkey" FOREIGN KEY
(library_id) REFERENCES dimension_library(id) DEFERRABLE INITIALLY
DEFERRED

                                   Table "public.dimension_book"
   Column  |          Type          |                          Modifiers
----------+------------------------
+-------------------------------------------------------------
  id       | integer                | not null default
nextval('dimension_book_id_seq'::regclass)
  acno     | character varying(255) |
  title    | character varying(255) |
  allusage | double precision       |
  dousage  | double precision       |
  comusage | double precision       |
  year     | integer                |
  language | character varying(255) |
  bclass   | character varying(255) |
  call     | character varying(255) | not null
Indexes:
     "dimension_book_pkey" PRIMARY KEY, btree (id)
     "call_idx" btree (call)
******************************************************/

dimension=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT   DISTINCT ON ("dimension_book"."call")
          "dimension_book"."title"
FROM     "dimension_book"
          INNER JOIN "dimension_library_books"
            ON ("dimension_book"."id" =
"dimension_library_books"."book_id")
WHERE    ("dimension_book"."call" >= 'PA0000'
           AND "dimension_library_books"."library_id" IN (12,15,20))
ORDER BY "dimension_book"."call" ASC
LIMIT 10;
                                                                                   QUERY
  PLAN

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Limit  (cost=0.00..19141.37 rows=10 width=105) (actual
time=0.349..1.874 rows=10 loops=1)
    ->  Unique  (cost=0.00..15389657.66 rows=8040 width=105) (actual
time=0.348..1.865 rows=10 loops=1)
          ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..15389443.94 rows=85489
width=105) (actual time=0.344..1.832 rows=14 loops=1)
                ->  Index Scan using call_idx on dimension_book
(cost=0.00..311156.04 rows=806644 width=105) (actual time=0.118..0.452
rows=133 loops=1)
                      Index Cond: ((call)::text >= 'PA0000'::text)
                ->  Index Scan using dimension_library_books_book_id
on dimension_library_books  (cost=0.00..18.61 rows=7 width=4) (actual
time=0.009..0.009 rows=0 loops=133)
                      Index Cond: (dimension_library_books.book_id =
dimension_book.id)
                      Filter: (dimension_library_books.library_id =
ANY ('{12,15,20}'::integer[]))
  Total runtime: 1.947 ms
(9 rows)

Time: 3.157 ms

dimension=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
SELECT   DISTINCT ON ("dimension_book"."call")
          "dimension_book"."title"
FROM     "dimension_book"
          INNER JOIN "dimension_library_books"
            ON ("dimension_book"."id" =
"dimension_library_books"."book_id")
WHERE    ("dimension_book"."call" >= 'PA0000'
           AND "dimension_library_books"."library_id" IN (12,15,20))
ORDER BY "dimension_book"."call" ASC
LIMIT 10 OFFSET 100;
                                                                                     QUERY
  PLAN

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Limit  (cost=137122.20..137122.73 rows=10 width=105) (actual
time=3428.164..3428.180 rows=10 loops=1)
    ->  Unique  (cost=137116.88..137544.33 rows=8040 width=105)
(actual time=3427.981..3428.159 rows=110 loops=1)
          ->  Sort  (cost=137116.88..137330.60 rows=85489 width=105)
(actual time=3427.978..3428.039 rows=212 loops=1)
                Sort Key: dimension_book.call
                Sort Method:  quicksort  Memory: 34844kB
                ->  Hash Join  (cost=71699.90..133790.78 rows=85489
width=105) (actual time=1676.993..2624.015 rows=167419 loops=1)
                      Hash Cond: (dimension_library_books.book_id =
dimension_book.id)
                      ->  Bitmap Heap Scan on dimension_library_books
(cost=3951.25..63069.35 rows=211789 width=4) (actual
time=112.627..581.554 rows=426156 loops=1)
                            Recheck Cond: (library_id = ANY
('{12,15,20}'::integer[]))
                            ->  Bitmap Index Scan on
dimension_library_books_library_id  (cost=0.00..3898.30 rows=211789
width=0) (actual time=95.030..95.030 rows=426156 loops=1)
                                  Index Cond: (library_id = ANY
('{12,15,20}'::integer[]))
                      ->  Hash  (cost=57665.60..57665.60 rows=806644
width=105) (actual time=1484.803..1484.803 rows=799876 loops=1)
                            ->  Seq Scan on dimension_book
(cost=0.00..57665.60 rows=806644 width=105) (actual
time=37.391..1028.518 rows=799876 loops=1)
                                  Filter: ((call)::text >=
'PA0000'::text)
  Total runtime: 3446.154 ms
(15 rows)

Time: 3447.396 ms


--
Colin Copeland
Caktus Consulting Group, LLC
P.O. Box 1454
Carrboro, NC 27510
(919) 951-0052
http://www.caktusgroup.com


Re: query planner and scanning methods

От
"Richard Broersma"
Дата:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Colin Copeland <copelco@caktusgroup.com> wrote:
> dimension=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
> SELECT   DISTINCT ON ("dimension_book"."call")
>         "dimension_book"."title"
> FROM     "dimension_book"
>         INNER JOIN "dimension_library_books"
>           ON ("dimension_book"."id" = "dimension_library_books"."book_id")
> WHERE    ("dimension_book"."call" >= 'PA0000'
>          AND "dimension_library_books"."library_id" IN (12,15,20))
> ORDER BY "dimension_book"."call" ASC
> LIMIT 10 OFFSET 100;

Ya offset works by scanning over the first 100 rows.  When the offsets
get big, it become a performance looser.

You can guarantee a faster index scan if you recall the last 10th
value from the previous query.  Then remove the offset predicate and
replace it with the following WHERE clause:

WHERE ...
AND dimension_book.call > _last_queried_10th_row-dimension_book_call,
...
LIMIT 10;


--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

Re: query planner and scanning methods

От
Colin Copeland
Дата:
On Sep 23, 2008, at 6:07 PM, Richard Broersma wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Colin Copeland <copelco@caktusgroup.com
> > wrote:
>> dimension=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
>> SELECT   DISTINCT ON ("dimension_book"."call")
>>        "dimension_book"."title"
>> FROM     "dimension_book"
>>        INNER JOIN "dimension_library_books"
>>          ON ("dimension_book"."id" =
>> "dimension_library_books"."book_id")
>> WHERE    ("dimension_book"."call" >= 'PA0000'
>>         AND "dimension_library_books"."library_id" IN (12,15,20))
>> ORDER BY "dimension_book"."call" ASC
>> LIMIT 10 OFFSET 100;
>
> Ya offset works by scanning over the first 100 rows.  When the offsets
> get big, it become a performance looser.
>
> You can guarantee a faster index scan if you recall the last 10th
> value from the previous query.  Then remove the offset predicate and
> replace it with the following WHERE clause:
>
> WHERE ...
> AND dimension_book.call > _last_queried_10th_row-dimension_book_call,
> ...
> LIMIT 10;

Richard,

Yes, I was thinking about this too. How would one generate a list of
pages from this, though? I can't predict values of dimension_book.call
(it's not a serial number).

Thanks,
   colin

--
Colin Copeland
Caktus Consulting Group, LLC
P.O. Box 1454
Carrboro, NC 27510
(919) 951-0052
http://www.caktusgroup.com


Re: query planner and scanning methods

От
"Richard Broersma"
Дата:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Colin Copeland <copelco@caktusgroup.com> wrote:

>>> dimension=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE
>>> SELECT   DISTINCT ON ("dimension_book"."call")
>>>       "dimension_book"."title"
>>> FROM     "dimension_book"
>>>       INNER JOIN "dimension_library_books"
>>>         ON ("dimension_book"."id" = "dimension_library_books"."book_id")
>>> WHERE    ("dimension_book"."call" >= 'PA0000'
>>>        AND "dimension_library_books"."library_id" IN (12,15,20))
>>> ORDER BY "dimension_book"."call" ASC
>>> LIMIT 10 OFFSET 100;

> Yes, I was thinking about this too. How would one generate a list of pages
> from this, though? I can't predict values of dimension_book.call (it's not a
> serial number).

I can think of one very ugly way to get the first record for each
page.  Hopefully, you will not need to generate these list pages very
often.  Also, you could probably refine the following query in a
couple of ways to improve performance.

SELECT A."dimension_book"."call", SUM( B."dimension_book"."call" ) AS
OrderedRowNbr
FROM ( your_above_query_without_the_limits ) AS A
INNER JOIN ( your_above_query_without_the_limits ) AS B
ON A."dimension_book"."call" >= B."dimension_book"."call"
ORDER BY A."dimension_book"."call"
HAVING SUM( A."dimension_book"."call" ) % 10 = 0;


--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug

Re: query planner and scanning methods

От
"Richard Broersma"
Дата:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Richard Broersma
<richard.broersma@gmail.com> wrote:
> SELECT A."dimension_book"."call", SUM( B."dimension_book"."call" ) AS
> OrderedRowNbr
> FROM ( your_above_query_without_the_limits ) AS A
> INNER JOIN ( your_above_query_without_the_limits ) AS B
> ON A."dimension_book"."call" >= B."dimension_book"."call"
> ORDER BY A."dimension_book"."call"
> HAVING SUM( A."dimension_book"."call" ) % 10 = 0;

Oops I just noticed that I used sum() where count() should be used and
that I forgot to include the group by clause.  Other than that, I hope
the suggestion was at least halfway helpful.

--
Regards,
Richard Broersma Jr.

Visit the Los Angeles PostgreSQL Users Group (LAPUG)
http://pugs.postgresql.org/lapug