Обсуждение: index is not used if I include a function that returns current time in my query
index is not used if I include a function that returns current time in my query
От
Cristian Veronesi
Дата:
Hello, postgresql 7.4.8 on SuSE Linux here.
I have a table called DMO with a column called ORA_RIF defined as
"timestamp without time zone" ;
I created an index on this table based on this column only.
If I run a query against a text literal the index is used:
> explain select * from dmo where ora_rif>'2006-01-01';
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Index Scan using dmo_ndx02 on dmo (cost=0.00..1183.23 rows=736 width=156)
Index Cond: (ora_rif > '2006-01-01 00:00:00'::timestamp without time
zone)
If I try to use a function that returns the current time instead, a
sequential scan is always performed:
> explain select * from dmo where ora_rif>localtimestamp;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on dmo (cost=0.00..1008253.22 rows=2703928 width=156)
Filter: (ora_rif > ('now'::text)::timestamp(6) without time zone)
> explain select * from dmo where ora_rif>localtimestamp::timestamp
without time zone;
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on dmo (cost=0.00..1008253.22 rows=2703928 width=156)
Filter: (ora_rif > ('now'::text)::timestamp(6) without time zone)
... etc. ...
(tried with all datetime functions with and without cast)
I even tried to write a function that explicitly returns a "timestamp
without time zone" value:
create or replace function f () returns timestamp without time zone
as '
declare
x timestamp without time zone ;
begin
x := ''2006-01-01 00:00:00'';
return x ;
end ;
' language plpgsql ;
But the result is the same:
> explain select * from dmo ora_rif>f();
QUERY PLAN
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on dmo (cost=0.00..987973.76 rows=2703928 width=156)
Filter: (ora_rif > f())
Any suggestion?
Kind regards,
--
Cristian Veronesi - C.R.P.A. S.p.A. - Reggio Emilia, Italy
The first thing you need to learn about databases is that
they are not just a fancy file system for storing data.
Cristian Veronesi <c.veronesi@crpa.it> writes:
> If I try to use a function that returns the current time instead, a
> sequential scan is always performed:
> ...
> Any suggestion?
1. Use something newer than 7.4 ;-)
2. Set up a dummy range constraint, ie
select ... where ora_rif > localtimestamp and ora_rif < 'infinity';
The problem you have is that the planner doesn't know the value of the
function and falls back to a default assumption about the selectivity of
the '>' condition --- and that default discourages indexscans. (Note
the very large estimate of number of rows returned.) In the
range-constraint situation, the planner still doesn't know the value of
the function, but its default assumption for a range constraint is
tighter and it (probably) will choose an indexscan.
Since PG 8.0, the planner understands that it's reasonable to
pre-evaluate certain functions like localtimestamp to obtain
better-than-guess values about selectivity, so updating would
be a better fix.
regards, tom lane