Обсуждение: Re: Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future?
Maybe he needs to spend $7K on performance improvements? ;-) -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-performance-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 8:00 PM To: Richard Huxton Cc: apoc9009@yahoo.de; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Table Partitioning: Will it be supported in Future? Richard, > I believe these are being worked on at the moment. You might want to > search the archives of the hackers mailing list to see if the plans > will suit your needs. Actually, this is being discussed through the Bizgres project: www.bizgres.org. However, I agree that a 1GB table is not in need of partitioning. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
On 4/26/05, Mohan, Ross <RMohan@arbinet.com> wrote: > Maybe he needs to spend $7K on performance improvements? > > ;-) > AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGG!!!!!!!!! I will forever hate the number 7,000 from this day forth! Seriously, though, I've never seen a thread on any list wander on so aimlessly for so long. Please, mommy, make it stop! -- Mike Rylander mrylander@gmail.com GPLS -- PINES Development Database Developer http://open-ils.org