greetings!
on a dedicated pgsql server is putting pg_xlog
in drive as OS almost equivalent to putting on a seperate
drive?
in both case the actual data files are in a seperate
drive.
regds
mallah
Mallah,
> on a dedicated pgsql server is putting pg_xlog
> in drive as OS almost equivalent to putting on a seperate
> drive?
Yes. If I have limited drives, this is what I do.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
In the last exciting episode, mallah@trade-india.com wrote:
> greetings!
> on a dedicated pgsql server is putting pg_xlog
> in drive as OS almost equivalent to putting on a seperate
> drive?
>
> in both case the actual data files are in a seperate
> drive.
Well, if the OS drive is relatively inactive, then it may be "separate
enough" that you won't find performance hurt too much by this.
--
If this was helpful, <http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=cbbrowne> rate me
http://cbbrowne.com/info/postgresql.html
MICROS~1 is not the answer.
MICROS~1 is the question.
NO (or Linux) is the answer.