Обсуждение: runtime of the same query in function differs on 2 degree!
Hi folks.
What's wrong with planner that executes my query in function?:
(i mean no explanation but runtime)
tele=# EXPLAIN analyze select calc_total(6916799, 1062363600, 1064955599);
QUERY PLAN
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=36919.37..36919.37 rows=1 loops=1)
Total runtime: 36919.40 msec
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
tele=# \df+ calc_total
...
declare
usr alias for $1;
d1 alias for $2;
d2 alias for $3;
res integer;
begin
select sum(cost) into res
from bills where
(parent(user_id) = usr or user_id = usr)
and dat >= d1 and dat < d2;
if res is not null then
return res;
else
return 0;
end if;
end;
tele=# EXPLAIN analyze select sum(cost) from bills where (parent(user_id) = 6916799 or user_id = 6916799) and dat >=
1062363600and dat < 10649555
99;
QUERY PLAN
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------
Aggregate (cost=17902.80..17902.80 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=101.04..101.04 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Index Scan using bills_parent_user_id_idx, bills_userid_dat_idx on bills (cost=0.00..17901.11 rows=679 width=4)
(actualtime=101.03..101.0
3 rows=0 loops=1)
Index Cond: ((parent(user_id) = 6916799) OR ((user_id = 6916799) AND (dat >= 1062363600) AND (dat <
1064955599)))
Filter: (((parent(user_id) = 6916799) OR (user_id = 6916799)) AND (dat >= 1062363600) AND (dat < 1064955599))
Total runtime: 101.14 msec
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
So the query is the same as in calc_total(usr,d1,d2) function,
but execute time extremely differs.
Is it normal?
Thanks,
Andriy Tkachuk.
Andriy Tkachuk <ant@imt.com.ua> writes:
> What's wrong with planner that executes my query in function?:
> tele=# EXPLAIN analyze select sum(cost) from bills where (parent(user_id) = 6916799 or user_id = 6916799) and dat >=
1062363600and dat < 10649555
> 99;
In the function case, the planner will not have access to the specific
values that "dat" is being compared to --- it'll see something like
... and dat >= $1 and dat < $2
In this case it has to fall back on a default estimate of how many rows
will be selected, and I suspect it's guessing that a seqscan will be
faster. The trouble is that for a sufficiently large range of d1/d2,
a seqscan *will* be faster.
You might find that the best solution is to use FOR ... EXECUTE and plug
the parameters into the query string so that the planner can see their
values. This will mean re-planning on every function call, but the
advantage is the plan will adapt to the actual range of d1/d2.
regards, tom lane
Andriy Tkachuk wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> What's wrong with planner that executes my query in function?:
> (i mean no explanation but runtime)
>
>
> tele=# EXPLAIN analyze select calc_total(6916799, 1062363600, 1064955599);
> QUERY PLAN
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=36919.37..36919.37 rows=1 loops=1)
> Total runtime: 36919.40 msec
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> tele=# \df+ calc_total
> ...
> declare
> usr alias for $1;
> d1 alias for $2;
> d2 alias for $3;
> res integer;
> begin
> select sum(cost) into res
> from bills where
> (parent(user_id) = usr or user_id = usr)
> and dat >= d1 and dat < d2;
> if res is not null then
> return res;
> else
> return 0;
> end if;
> end;
You didn't wrote the type of d1 and d2, I had your same problem:
declare
a_user alias for $1;
res INTEGER;
begin
select cost into res
from my_table
where login = a_user;
......
end;
the problem was that login was a VARCHAR and a_user was a TEXT so
the index was not used, was enough cast a_user::varchar;
I believe that your dat, d1, d2 are not "index" comparable.
Gaetano
No: the function is calc_total(int,int,int) and the table have the same types. As Tom said that my problem is because of planning in pl/pgsql. As is written in http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/plpgsql.html#PLPGSQL-OVERVIEW plans for queries in pl/pgsql are made just once - when they are first used in function by backend. So AFAICS this planning do not take into consideration table statistics because it don't see values of variables in queries (or if see than it must not take them into account, because they may be changed in future function callings). I rollback to my previous realization of calc_total() on pl/tcl. I use there spi_exec - so the query always regards as dynamic - it always parsed, rewritten, planned but executes fastest much more :) On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Gaetano Mendola wrote: > Andriy Tkachuk wrote: > > > Hi folks. > > > > What's wrong with planner that executes my query in function?: > > (i mean no explanation but runtime) > > > > > > tele=# EXPLAIN analyze select calc_total(6916799, 1062363600, 1064955599); > > QUERY PLAN > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=36919.37..36919.37 rows=1 loops=1) > > Total runtime: 36919.40 msec > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > tele=# \df+ calc_total > > ... > > declare > > usr alias for $1; > > d1 alias for $2; > > d2 alias for $3; > > res integer; > > begin > > select sum(cost) into res > > from bills where > > (parent(user_id) = usr or user_id = usr) > > and dat >= d1 and dat < d2; > > if res is not null then > > return res; > > else > > return 0; > > end if; > > end; > > You didn't wrote the type of d1 and d2, I had your same problem: > > declare > a_user alias for $1; > res INTEGER; > begin > select cost into res > from my_table > where login = a_user; > > ...... > end; > > the problem was that login was a VARCHAR and a_user was a TEXT so > the index was not used, was enough cast a_user::varchar; > > > I believe that your dat, d1, d2 are not "index" comparable. > > > Gaetano > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings