Обсуждение: log rotatoin doc updates
This patch updates log rotation documentation:
+ Removed false statement that log_filename can only be changed on restart
(it is reloadable via sighup);
+ Added a couple of examples;
+ Cleaned up a few smgl tags;
Вложения
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> This patch updates log rotation documentation:
Applied, except for
> + Removed false statement that log_filename can only be changed on restart
> (it is reloadable via sighup);
The statement was correct as given so I didn't remove it. (If you think
it should mention that SIGHUP works, there are several dozen other uses
of the identical wording to describe SIGHUP variables ...)
> + Added a couple of examples;
I moved these down a little, since it didn't seem to make sense to
provide an example before all the relevant variables had been discussed.
I'm not sure about the markup here; it might be better to break out of
the <variablelist> and format the examples as independent paragraphs.
Comments anyone?
regards, tom lane
On Friday September 17 2004 4:44, Tom Lane wrote: > "Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes: > > This patch updates log rotation documentation: > > Applied, except for > > > + Removed false statement that log_filename can only be changed on > > restart (it is reloadable via sighup); > > The statement was correct as given so I didn't remove it. (If you think > it should mention that SIGHUP works, there are several dozen other uses > of the identical wording to describe SIGHUP variables ...) "This option can only be set at server start or in the <filename>postgresql.conf</filename> configuration file." My misunderstanding. I misread the above to mean SIGHUP did not work, as opposed to postgresql.conf variables for which SIGHUP *will* reload them. I guess the word "only" refers to not being able to use SET? Ed
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> My misunderstanding. I misread the above to mean SIGHUP did not work, as
> opposed to postgresql.conf variables for which SIGHUP *will* reload them.
> I guess the word "only" refers to not being able to use SET?
Or ALTER DATABASE, ALTER USER, etc.
I guess the wording assumes that you know that altering postgresql.conf
requires a SIGHUP to make anything happen. I wouldn't object to
inserting some explicit mention of SIGHUP into these canned phrases,
if it can be done without making it much longer or more obscure.
Any thoughts?
regards, tom lane
> ! <para> > ! Example: To keep Why aren't 'example' tags used here? Seems it would be more appropriate then "<para>Example: ...</para>".. Example tag: (http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/example.html) (http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/runtime-config.html) Tom: Also, what do you mean by 'break out of the <variablelist>'? Have the examples follow the <variablelist> or have the examples set in such a way so as the <listitem>'s indentation doesn't affect the example's text? -- Regards, James William Pye
Вложения
James William Pye <flaw@rhid.com> writes:
> Also, what do you mean by 'break out of the <variablelist>'?
I meant end the variablelist, format the examples, start a new
variablelist for the following variables.
Or we could put the examples at the end of the subsection, but that
seems awkwardly far away.
regards, tom lane