Обсуждение: [PATCH] s_lock support for win32
Hi,
The win32 port doesn't have a native user space spinlock implementation
yet. Attached is an untested patch - could someone test it? I don't have
Visual C++.
--
Manfred
Index: src/include/storage/s_lock.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/include/storage/s_lock.h,v
retrieving revision 1.126
diff -c -r1.126 s_lock.h
*** src/include/storage/s_lock.h 19 Jun 2004 23:02:32 -0000 1.126
--- src/include/storage/s_lock.h 30 Jun 2004 17:14:08 -0000
***************
*** 648,653 ****
--- 648,661 ----
#endif /* !defined(HAS_TEST_AND_SET) */
+ #if defined(WIN32)
+ #define HAS_TEST_AND_SET
+
+ typedef long slock_t;
+
+ #define TAS(lock) (InterlockedExchange(lock, 1))
+ #define S_UNLOCK(lock) (InterlockedExchange(lock, 0))
+ #endif
/* Blow up if we didn't have any way to do spinlocks */
#ifndef HAS_TEST_AND_SET
> The win32 port doesn't have a native user space spinlock > implementation yet. It does when compiled with MingW. Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see <a href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html</a>
Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes:
>> The win32 port doesn't have a native user space spinlock
>> implementation yet.
> It does when compiled with MingW.
Are we intending to support any other compilers/build environments
than that one?
Offhand I would prefer to see us using the existing i386 spinlock
code under Windows, because that's already tested and known to work.
However I can see that this would not fly when using a non-gcc
compiler ...
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane writes: > Claudio Natoli <claudio.natoli@memetrics.com> writes: > >> The win32 port doesn't have a native user space spinlock > >> implementation yet. > > > It does when compiled with MingW. > > Are we intending to support any other compilers/build environments > than that one? Not currently; at least not for the backend, as psql/libpq etc continue to also be supported under VC++. Cheers, Claudio --- Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics. For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see <a href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em ailpolicy.html</a>
Because we don't support non-gcc Win32 builds of the backend, adding this patch doesn't make sense. If we ever start to support non-gcc Win32 backends we can add this. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Manfred Spraul wrote: > Hi, > > The win32 port doesn't have a native user space spinlock implementation > yet. Attached is an untested patch - could someone test it? I don't have > Visual C++. > > -- > Manfred > > > !DSPAM:40e2f9cf213266268715824! > Index: src/include/storage/s_lock.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /projects/cvsroot/pgsql-server/src/include/storage/s_lock.h,v > retrieving revision 1.126 > diff -c -r1.126 s_lock.h > *** src/include/storage/s_lock.h 19 Jun 2004 23:02:32 -0000 1.126 > --- src/include/storage/s_lock.h 30 Jun 2004 17:14:08 -0000 > *************** > *** 648,653 **** > --- 648,661 ---- > > #endif /* !defined(HAS_TEST_AND_SET) */ > > + #if defined(WIN32) > + #define HAS_TEST_AND_SET > + > + typedef long slock_t; > + > + #define TAS(lock) (InterlockedExchange(lock, 1)) > + #define S_UNLOCK(lock) (InterlockedExchange(lock, 0)) > + #endif > > /* Blow up if we didn't have any way to do spinlocks */ > #ifndef HAS_TEST_AND_SET > > > !DSPAM:40e2f9cf213266268715824! > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html > > > !DSPAM:40e2f9cf213266268715824! -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Because we don't support non-gcc Win32 builds of the backend, adding
>this patch doesn't make sense. If we ever start to support non-gcc
>Win32 backends we can add this.
>
>
>
Ok. I wasn't aware that the backend is gcc-only.
But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for
corruptions.
--
Manfred
Manfred Spraul wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >Because we don't support non-gcc Win32 builds of the backend, adding > >this patch doesn't make sense. If we ever start to support non-gcc > >Win32 backends we can add this. > > > > > > > Ok. I wasn't aware that the backend is gcc-only. > But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for > corruptions. The backend is gcc (MinGW) only on Win32. We support non-gcc, but not on Win32. Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Manfred Spraul wrote:
>> But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for
>> corruptions.
> Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon.
Has this been agreed to by the win32-hackers list? My recollection is
that there was still considerable disagreement about the appropriate
way to deal with this issue.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Manfred Spraul wrote: > >> But what about my libpq patch? Races in the library startup just ask for > >> corruptions. > > > Yes, I saw the thread locking patch and will be applying that soon. > > Has this been agreed to by the win32-hackers list? My recollection is > that there was still considerable disagreement about the appropriate > way to deal with this issue. Yes, we resolved that by doing proper locking (3 weeks ago), but it turns out the code wasn't 100% proper and this fixes it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073