Обсуждение: tablespace?
I see no mention of tablespace in Worsley and Drake. Is ts not smiled on, new, or just not in the scope of the book? No option on create user to define a default ts makes me wonder if ts is not "good."
> I see no mention of tablespace in Worsley and Drake. Is ts not > smiled on, new, or just not in the scope of the book? No option on create > user to define a default ts makes me wonder if ts is not "good." > I am not sure if I remember correctly, but I remember reading something on the general-mailing list about a year ago that suggested that care had to be taken to get the data off of all of the tablespaces in relation to the main data direcotry, if file system back-ups were used. However on *nix, symbolic links are used easily enough to provide similar access to data on other files sytems without any complication in the DDL statements. In my book by douglas, mention was made to using table spaces for placing indexs on expensive/fast access semi-conductor drives. But I imagine this could also be achieved with symoblic links anyway. Regards, Richard Broersma Jr.
Ray Stell wrote: > I see no mention of tablespace in Worsley and Drake. Is ts not > smiled on, new, or just not in the scope of the book? No option on > create user to define a default ts makes me wonder if ts is not > "good." Tablespaces were added in 8.0, January 2005. When was the book published? -- John Koller
2002 if memory does not fail me. Thanks. On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 10:55:19PM -0500, John Koller wrote: > Ray Stell wrote: > > > I see no mention of tablespace in Worsley and Drake. Is ts not > > smiled on, new, or just not in the scope of the book? No option on > > create user to define a default ts makes me wonder if ts is not > > "good." > > Tablespaces were added in 8.0, January 2005. When was the book > published? > -- > John Koller > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend --