Обсуждение: Retrieving NULL records
Hi,
How would you retrieve records containing NULL values?
Lets say you have a table called stock:
stock=> \d stock
Table "public.stock"
Column | Type | Modifiers
----------+-----------------------+-------------------------------------------------------------
stock_id | integer | not null default nextval('public.stock_stock_id_seq'::text)
name | character varying(20) | not null
qty | integer |
it contains the following records:
stock=> select * from stock;
stock_id | name | qty
----------+-----------+-----
1 | Chair | 10
2 | Desk | 10
3 | Phone | 10
4 | Chalk |
5 | Projector |
(5 rows)
So what i want to do is retrieve 'Chalk' and 'Projector';
Ive tried this but it didnt work.
stock=> select * from stock where qty = NULL;
stock_id | name | qty
----------+------+-----
(0 rows)
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance
--
____________________________________________
http://www.operamail.com
Get OperaMail Premium today - USD 29.99/year
Powered by Outblaze
"psql novice" <psql_novice@operamail.com> writes:
> stock=> select * from stock where qty = NULL;
The correct incantation is
select * from stock where qty IS NULL;
Ordinary comparisons involving NULL always fail (or more accurately,
return NULL). You have to use the special "is null" operator instead.
regards, tom lane
Shouldn't = NULL be considered a syntax error ? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb am 29.07.2003, 07:41:15: > "psql novice" writes: > > stock=> select * from stock where qty = NULL; > > The correct incantation is > > select * from stock where qty IS NULL; > > Ordinary comparisons involving NULL always fail (or more accurately, > return NULL). You have to use the special "is null" operator instead. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org
it is now.. i had to port lots of our old C applications when i upgraded to a newer postgres. -----Original Message----- From: pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-novice-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of email@juergen-cappel.de Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 2:40 PM To: pgsql-novice@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [NOVICE] Retrieving NULL records Shouldn't = NULL be considered a syntax error ? Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> schrieb am 29.07.2003, 07:41:15: > "psql novice" writes: > > stock=> select * from stock where qty = NULL; > > The correct incantation is > > select * from stock where qty IS NULL; > > Ordinary comparisons involving NULL always fail (or more accurately, > return NULL). You have to use the special "is null" operator instead. > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
Am Die, 2003-07-29 um 13.20 schrieb Mel Jamero: > it is now.. > > i had to port lots of our old C applications when i upgraded to a newer > postgres. I know that it's bad to use null=null, but for old projects that 'just work' the way they were programmed you can set transform_null_equals = true in postgresql.conf hth -- e-Trolley Sayegh & John, Nabil Sayegh Tel.: 0700 etrolley /// 0700 38765539 Fax.: +49 69 8299381-8 PGP : http://www.e-trolley.de