Обсуждение: Buildfarm test failures on JDK 5
The PG-JDBC buildfarm member (http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac) has been failing to build for JDK 5 for the last 18 days. I've attached a patch that corrects the tests that have been added that used methods introduced in JDK 6. Apologies for not noticing the issue sooner - I really ought to but some sort of alerting in place! Kind regards, -- Mike Fowler Registered Linux user: 379787
Вложения
Hey Mike,
Thanks for this.
With java 1.5 eol quite a while ago I am wondering if we shouldn't stop writing code for it ?
Thoughts ?
On 16 May 2014 05:52, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> wrote:
The PG-JDBC buildfarm member
(http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl?member=piapiac) has
been failing to build for JDK 5 for the last 18 days. I've attached a
patch that corrects the tests that have been added that used methods
introduced in JDK 6. Apologies for not noticing the issue sooner - I
really ought to but some sort of alerting in place!
Kind regards,
--
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote: > > With java 1.5 eol quite a while ago I am wondering if we shouldn't stop > writing code for it ? > > Thoughts ? Unless any organisation requires Java 5 support I'd tend to agree that new code shouldn't support it. What's the driver policy on supporting Java versions given that 8 is now out?
I'm of the opinion that we backpatch any bugs below 1.7
new code works with 1.7 and up
thoughts ?
On 16 May 2014 07:29, Stephen Nelson <stephen@eccostudio.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com> wrote:Unless any organisation requires Java 5 support I'd tend to agree that
>
> With java 1.5 eol quite a while ago I am wondering if we shouldn't stop
> writing code for it ?
>
> Thoughts ?
new code shouldn't support it. What's the driver policy on supporting
Java versions given that 8 is now out?
--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
On 05/16/2014 07:22 AM, Dave Cramer wrote: > I'm of the opinion that we backpatch any bugs below 1.7 > > new code works with 1.7 and up > > thoughts ? +1 -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermath -- and Cenbe."
On Fri, May 16, 2014 2:16 pm, Glenn Holmer wrote: > On 05/16/2014 07:22 AM, Dave Cramer wrote: > >> I'm of the opinion that we backpatch any bugs below 1.7 >> >> >> new code works with 1.7 and up >> >> thoughts ? > > +1 > +1 I've switched off JDK 5 from my build farm so it should start reporting green with the next builds. Someone will need to update the downloads section to reflect the fact that JDK 6 is now the minimum. Kind regards, -- Mike Fowler Registered Linux user: 379787
I'll put it on my todo list ;)
On 19 May 2014 03:43, Mike Fowler <mike@mlfowler.com> wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 2:16 pm, Glenn Holmer wrote:+1
> On 05/16/2014 07:22 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
>
>> I'm of the opinion that we backpatch any bugs below 1.7
>>
>>
>> new code works with 1.7 and up
>>
>> thoughts ?
>
> +1
>
I've switched off JDK 5 from my build farm so it should start reporting
green with the next builds. Someone will need to update the downloads
section to reflect the fact that JDK 6 is now the minimum.
Kind regards,
--
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787--
Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc