Обсуждение: DataSource
Hello jdbcList! Which classes implement the javax.sql.DataSource and javax.sql.XADataSource interfaces in Postgres JDBC ? PG_VERSION -> 7.3 Thanks. AI
If you want XA, you need this patch: http://www.hut.fi/~hlinnaka/pgsql/ Or you can try to use EnabledDatasource from tyrex. Laszlo On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-2] Avramucz István wrote: > > Hello jdbcList! > > Which classes implement the javax.sql.DataSource and > javax.sql.XADataSource interfaces in Postgres JDBC ? > > PG_VERSION -> 7.3 > > Thanks. > AI > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org >
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-2] Avramucz István wrote: > Which classes implement the javax.sql.DataSource and http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/jdbc-datasource.html > javax.sql.XADataSource interfaces in Postgres JDBC ? > PostgreSQL does not have XA support because the backend does not have two phase commit support. There is hope this will be coming in version 8.1. Kris Jurka
It is unlikely for 8.1 as the current plan is a 2 month release cycle which will not allow this patch to be implemented. Dave Kris Jurka wrote: >On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, [ISO-8859-2] Avramucz István wrote: > > > >>Which classes implement the javax.sql.DataSource and >> >> > >http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/jdbc-datasource.html > > > >>javax.sql.XADataSource interfaces in Postgres JDBC ? >> >> >> > >PostgreSQL does not have XA support because the backend does not have two >phase commit support. There is hope this will be coming in version 8.1. > >Kris Jurka > > >---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- >TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings > > > > -- Dave Cramer http://www.postgresintl.com 519 939 0336 ICQ#14675561
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005, Dave Cramer wrote: > It is unlikely for 8.1 as the current plan is a 2 month release cycle > which will not allow this patch to be implemented. > I wouldn't say that this is the current plan. It's been discussed, but no agreement that I can see has been reached. Certainly a two month cycle and short beta is a challenge for a development group that has just completed five and a half month beta period. I also don't see how this won't kill new feature development unless the 8.2 branch is opened for commits immediately. I don't wish to start that debate here, but I would not agree that it a foregone conclusion that this will not be in 8.1. Kris Jurka