I'm a newbie to PostgreSQL ODBC applications, so please forgive me if the is
a FAQ.
I'm writing a VBA/Excel app (new to that, too) and am having great success
with retrieving data from PostgreSQL, but the recordsets (using DAO) are
flagged as not Updatable. I have made sure the the ODBC driver read-only
flag is set to off/false/zero, but no luck. I'm sure it's just my
ignorance, but where else should I look for the cause of getting
non-updatable recordsets?
--Brian Haney
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-pgsql-interfaces-digest@hub.org
> [mailto:owner-pgsql-interfaces-digest@hub.org]
> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 1999 8:03 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces-digest@hub.org
> Subject: pgsql-interfaces-digest V1 #562
>
>
>
> pgsql-interfaces-digest Saturday, November 27 1999 Volume 01 :
> Number 562
>
>
>
> Index:
>
> Re: [INTERFACES] Slow join query optimisation?
> Re: [INTERFACES] Spanish format on date and numbers
> datetime, JDBC, and MS Access
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 00:36:41 -0500
> From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Slow join query optimisation?
>
> Douglas Thomson <dougt@mugc.cc.monash.edu.au> writes:
> > My question for the list: Is there something in the query optimiser
> > that will take a time that is something like exponential on the number
> > of tables being joined?
>
> Yes. See the manual's discussion of genetic query optimization. You
> might try setting the GEQO threshold to something less than 10.
>
> FWIW, the time you are looking at here is strictly planning time and
> will not increase when you actually put data in the tables. Unless
> you foresee fairly small final tables, the planning time is not likely
> to be a significant factor in this range of query sizes.
>
> Still, if the purpose of the join is just to substitute descriptions
> for IDs, you'd be well advised to consider doing it via table lookup
> on the frontend side, assuming your frontend is coded in a language
> that makes that reasonable to do. The Postgres optimizer cannot
> help but waste many cycles per query reverse-engineering your intent,
> even assuming that it ultimately comes up with the best possible
> query plan for the join...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 13:34:02 +0000 (GMT)
> From: "Patrick Welche" <prlw1@newn.cam.ac.uk>
> Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Spanish format on date and numbers
>
> Oscar Serrano wrote:
>
> > And it seems that I must first define and export the variables
> LANG, LC_ALL,
> > LC_CTYPE (and probably LC_COLLATE).
> > The LANG variable seems to must be: LANG="es_ES", for spanish
> configuration.
> > The LC_CTYPE must be something like this: LC_CTYPE="ISO8859-1".
> But, what is
> > the ISO for spain?
>
> Vague memory tells me it's ISO8859-2. I use LC_CTYPE=iso_8859_1, as in my
> /usr/share/locale directory (this is under NetBSD) I have
>
> % ls /usr/share/locale
> de es iso_8859_1 nl pl sl
> el fr ko no ru sv
> % ls /usr/share/locale/iso_8859_1
> LC_CTYPE
>
> I don't know where I would find nor how to write an appropriate LC_CTYPE
> file - never needed to, and never tried --enable-locale - I just
> set LC_CTYPE
> for nice keyboard sequences.
>
> > So, if I define this variables and use the --enable-locale, the
> psql will
> > return the numbers and dates in the spanish format?
> > I can't believe it.
>
> There's only one way to find out!
>
> Good luck,
>
> Patrick
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 21:44:44 +0100
> From: "Oscar Serrano" <oserra@fondos.net>
> Subject: datetime, JDBC, and MS Access
>
> Hi:
> Probably someone of you can tellme what am I doing wrong:
>
> I create a table in psql, with an unique column of the type
> "date" wich name
> is "columdate".
> Then, via JDBC, I try to put the content of that column in a Java Date
> object. OK, no problem. I write this:
>
> Date mydate=rs.getDate("columndate");
>
> Now I can operate with mydate normaly.
>
> But the PROBLEM is when in psql, the column "columndate" is of the type
> "datetime". In that case, the java sentence puts null to mydate.
>
> Why as "date" works and as "datetime" it doesn't work?
>
> If also tried this:
> Timestamp mydate=rs.getTimestamp("columndate");
>
> but it doesn't work.
>
> I would define de column as "date" the problem is solved, but,
> you know, the
> tables are created exporting them from MS Access via ODBC, and
> when exported
> so, postgresql converts to "datetime" all columns that in MS
> Access were of
> the type "Date/Hour".
>
> I could get my problem solved if some of you knows how to tell Access to
> export "Date/Hour" types to postgresql "date" in side of "datetime".
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of pgsql-interfaces-digest V1 #562
> **************************************
>
>
> ************
>