Обсуждение: proclock table corrupted
Hi,
We are encoutering the following error during normal operation of postgres.
postgres[10982]: [2-1] PANIC: proclock table corrupted
Version of Postgres : 9.0.3
Architecture : mips
OS: RedHat Linux
Can you please let me know if 'fix-strong-lock-cleanup.patch' and this error are related?
Regards,
Harshitha
Harshitha S <hershetha@gmail.com> writes: > We are encoutering the following error during normal operation of postgres. > postgres[10982]: [2-1] PANIC: proclock table corrupted Ugh. Can you provide a reproducible test case? > Version of Postgres : 9.0.3 > Architecture : mips > OS: RedHat Linux [ raised eyebrow... ] I've been working at Red Hat for ten years, and I'm pretty sure they have never shipped a MIPS-based distro in that time. So what is that OS really? > Can you please let me know if 'fix-strong-lock-cleanup.patch' and this > error are related? This is not an adequate identification of what patch you are talking about; but if you are speaking of something related to Robert Haas' fast-path locking code, that's not in 9.0.x. regards, tom lane
Sorry, the OS is WindRiver Linux.
Yes , I am taking of the fast path locking patch discussed in the link below.
Regards,
Harshitha
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
Harshitha S <hershetha@gmail.com> writes:Ugh. Can you provide a reproducible test case?
> We are encoutering the following error during normal operation of postgres.
> postgres[10982]: [2-1] PANIC: proclock table corrupted[ raised eyebrow... ] I've been working at Red Hat for ten years, and
> Version of Postgres : 9.0.3
> Architecture : mips
> OS: RedHat Linux
I'm pretty sure they have never shipped a MIPS-based distro in that time.
So what is that OS really?This is not an adequate identification of what patch you are talking
> Can you please let me know if 'fix-strong-lock-cleanup.patch' and this
> error are related?
about; but if you are speaking of something related to Robert Haas'
fast-path locking code, that's not in 9.0.x.
regards, tom lane
Harshitha S <hershetha@gmail.com> writes: > Sorry, the OS is WindRiver Linux. What I would suspect first is issues with the MIPS spinlock assembly code (look into s_lock.h) not being portable to your platform. That code hasn't been tested on very many machines, I suspect. It's not impossible that it doesn't work at all on multiprocessor machines; is yours one? > Yes , I am taking of the fast path locking patch discussed in the link > below. > http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/bug-in-fast-path-locking-td5626629.html Not relevant to 9.0.x, for sure. regards, tom lane