Обсуждение: Update comments for PGPROC/PGXACT split

Many comment references to PGPROC and MyProc should now refer to PGXACT and
MyPgXact.  This patch attempts to cover all such cases.  In some places, a
comment refers collectively to all the xid-related fields, which span both
structures.  I variously changed those to refer to either or both structures
depending on how I judged the emphasis.

The PGXACT patch extracted the PGPROC struct formerly embedded in each
GlobalTransaction.  I updated a few comments accordingly.

The procarray.c leading comment described the procarray as "unsorted", but it
is sorted by memory address; I removed that word.

I include two typo-only fixes on related but already-accurate lines.

Thanks,
nm

On 13.05.2012 23:52, Noah Misch wrote:
> Many comment references to PGPROC and MyProc should now refer to PGXACT and
> MyPgXact.  This patch attempts to cover all such cases.  In some places, a
> comment refers collectively to all the xid-related fields, which span both
> structures.  I variously changed those to refer to either or both structures
> depending on how I judged the emphasis.
>
> The PGXACT patch extracted the PGPROC struct formerly embedded in each
> GlobalTransaction.  I updated a few comments accordingly.
>
> The procarray.c leading comment described the procarray as "unsorted", but it
> is sorted by memory address; I removed that word.
>
> I include two typo-only fixes on related but already-accurate lines.

Thanks, applied!

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com