Обсуждение: Moving the community git server
Sometime later this week, the community git server (git.postgresql.org) will be migrated to a new server in the same datacenter. This does *not* affect the master git server for the project, just the anonymous mirror and those that run standalone projects on it, such as pgAdmin. When this move is done, the IP will change to a different address in the same subnet, and the server will have a new SSH key. That means you will get a security warning if you use the ssh protocol. The fingerprint of the new server is going to be: cc:0c:27:40:d7:a2:98:f4:69:07:0c:b6:3a:05:19:71 - verify that this is the one when you get a warning. When the server has been migrated, the old one will be switched to read-only access through http and git protocols for a day or two. The ssh protocol will be completely turned off on the old server. If you get an error about ssh login, it may simply mean that your DNS hasn't yet updated. I'll post again here with more details when the actual move happens, but I wanted to get a notice out early since it will cause security warnings for anybody trying to access it after the move. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
This move should now be completed. If you see any errors still - other than the change of SSH key - please validate that you have the new IP address (204.145.120.222) - it could be excessive DNS caching. If you have verified both the SSH key and the IP address and still see problems, please let me know via email or irc and i'll take a look as soon as I can! //Magnus On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 23:35, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > Sometime later this week, the community git server > (git.postgresql.org) will be migrated to a new server in the same > datacenter. This does *not* affect the master git server for the > project, just the anonymous mirror and those that run standalone > projects on it, such as pgAdmin. > > When this move is done, the IP will change to a different address in > the same subnet, and the server will have a new SSH key. That means > you will get a security warning if you use the ssh protocol. The > fingerprint of the new server is going to be: > cc:0c:27:40:d7:a2:98:f4:69:07:0c:b6:3a:05:19:71 - verify that this is > the one when you get a warning. > > When the server has been migrated, the old one will be switched to > read-only access through http and git protocols for a day or two. The > ssh protocol will be completely turned off on the old server. If you > get an error about ssh login, it may simply mean that your DNS hasn't > yet updated. > > I'll post again here with more details when the actual move happens, > but I wanted to get a notice out early since it will cause security > warnings for anybody trying to access it after the move. > > -- > Magnus Hagander > Me: http://www.hagander.net/ > Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ > -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > This move should now be completed. Something weird seems to have happened to the gitweb service at the same time, which broke some of my bookmarks. On investigation, I think it's gotten pickier about the local-part of the URLs. For example http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git OK http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git 404 Is the latter supposed to work? The former looks a bit odd to me, but I'm no expert. regards, tom lane
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> This move should now be completed. > > Something weird seems to have happened to the gitweb service at the same > time, which broke some of my bookmarks. On investigation, I think it's > gotten pickier about the local-part of the URLs. For example > > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git OK > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git 404 > > Is the latter supposed to work? The former looks a bit odd to me, > but I'm no expert. I can confirm it broke. Both really should work I think - I'll take a look at why later this evening, hopefully it's a quick fix. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:12, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>> This move should now be completed. >> >> Something weird seems to have happened to the gitweb service at the same >> time, which broke some of my bookmarks. On investigation, I think it's >> gotten pickier about the local-part of the URLs. For example >> >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git OK >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git 404 >> >> Is the latter supposed to work? The former looks a bit odd to me, >> but I'm no expert. > > I can confirm it broke. Both really should work I think - I'll take a > look at why later this evening, hopefully it's a quick fix. Should be fixed with a redirect now. -- Magnus Hagander Me: http://www.hagander.net/ Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >> On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 17:09, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git OK >>> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=postgresql.git 404 > Should be fixed with a redirect now. Thanks, my bookmarks seem OK again. regards, tom lane