Обсуждение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:10 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org> wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. > (And there was much rejoicing.) /me opens a beer. How long should I wait before I start breaking things? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Jul 8, 2010, at 9:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > /me opens a beer. > > How long should I wait before I start breaking things? I should think that you would need to drink at least 5-6 beers before you started stumbling around and breaking shit. David
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel.
>> (And there was much rejoicing.)
> /me opens a beer.
> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
I'm hesitant to have a whole lot of variance between REL9_0_STABLE and
HEAD just yet, since we'll surely be doing a lot of double-patching for
awhile. Localized patches, no problem, but this might not be the best
time to s/foo/bar/g or something like that.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:31 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>> Stamp HEAD as 9.1devel. >>> (And there was much rejoicing.) > >> /me opens a beer. > >> How long should I wait before I start breaking things? > > Did you have any particular breakage in mind? > > I'm hesitant to have a whole lot of variance between REL9_0_STABLE and > HEAD just yet, since we'll surely be doing a lot of double-patching for > awhile. Localized patches, no problem, but this might not be the best > time to s/foo/bar/g or something like that. Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF. As those things get reviewed, I'd like to get them committed; many of them need follow-on patches in which I don't want to invest too much effort until the initial patches go in. And then, too, other people have also submitted patches which I will be working on also. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things?
>>
>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind?
> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF.
You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit,
but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized. No objection
to pressing forward with CF work otherwise.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things? >>> >>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind? > >> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF. > > You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit, > but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized. No objection > to pressing forward with CF work otherwise. I can hold off on those for a bit - I don't think there will be enough drift to matter very much, but if it makes you more comfortable, it's not a big deal. What I really want to get committed is this one, which is infrastructure for a further large patch: include Backend ID in relpath for temp rels https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=302 However, I need someone fairly knowledgeable to review it first. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> How long should I wait before I start breaking things? >>>> >>>> Did you have any particular breakage in mind? >> >>> Well, you can see for yourself what I've submitted for the next CF. >> >> You might want to hold off on the get_whatever_oid patches for a bit, >> but the other stuff I see there looks pretty localized. No objection >> to pressing forward with CF work otherwise. > > I can hold off on those for a bit - I don't think there will be enough > drift to matter very much, but if it makes you more comfortable, it's > not a big deal. I checked on these patches today and there was only one, quite trivial conflict (and the relevant patch was not even something that was back-patched). So I think there is not much reason to hold off any longer on committing these. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise Postgres Company