Обсуждение: Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim@gunduz.org> writes:
> I was trying to make a scratch build in Koji for orafce package, and it
> failed:

> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1235602&name=build.log

> I consulted #fedora-devel @ Freenode, and the conclusion was this:

> <walters> devrimgunduz: the devel subpackage needs a Requires:
> systemtap-sdt-devel

> He is talking about postgresql-devel package actually.

The reason this is a problem is that in 8.3, pg_trace.h is included by
c.h, which means that *anything* built against Postgres headers needs
access to the dtrace headers if we configured --enable-dtrace.

As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
included only by the .c files that actually need it.  ISTM that we
should make 8.3 do likewise.  Having postgresql-devel drag in
systemtap-sdt-devel would pretty much suck IMHO.

Comments?
        regards, tom lane


Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

От
Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Tom Lane wrote:

> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
> included only by the .c files that actually need it.  ISTM that we
> should make 8.3 do likewise.

Here's a patch for this.

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

Вложения

Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
>> included only by the .c files that actually need it.  ISTM that we
>> should make 8.3 do likewise.

> Here's a patch for this.

Oh, thanks, I was just about to go off and do that myself, but you
saved me the trouble.  Please commit.
        regards, tom lane


Re: About the new %sdt macro in F-11 package

От
Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> As of CVS HEAD, I see that we got rid of that, and pg_trace.h is now
> >> included only by the .c files that actually need it.  ISTM that we
> >> should make 8.3 do likewise.
> 
> > Here's a patch for this.
> 
> Oh, thanks, I was just about to go off and do that myself, but you
> saved me the trouble.  Please commit.

Done.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support