Обсуждение: CVS head has broken make
Getting this, my cvs copy is as of 1:00PM EST. [root@boron pgsql]# ./configure --prefix=/usr checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking which template to use... linux checking whether to build with 64-bit integer date/time support... yes checking whether NLS is wanted... no checking for default port number... 5432 checking for gcov... gcov checking for lcov... no configure: error: lcov not found I get the same error trying to make libpq. Another box with a copy from yesterday afternoon builds fine. Things updated that may be related. P GNUmakefile.in P configure P configure.in P src/Makefile.global.in P src/backend/common.mk -- Andrew Chernow eSilo, LLC every bit counts http://www.esilo.com/
Andrew Chernow wrote: > Getting this, my cvs copy is as of 1:00PM EST. > > [root@boron pgsql]# ./configure --prefix=/usr > checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > checking which template to use... linux > checking whether to build with 64-bit integer date/time support... yes > checking whether NLS is wanted... no > checking for default port number... 5432 > checking for gcov... gcov > checking for lcov... no > configure: error: lcov not found > > I get the same error trying to make libpq. Another box with a copy from > yesterday afternoon builds fine. > > Things updated that may be related. yeah the "code coverage" changes broke it - the buildfarm dashboard is pretty telling: http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_status.pl Stefan
Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
> yeah the "code coverage" changes broke it - the buildfarm dashboard is
> pretty telling:
Yes --- it looks like the configure.in patch is designed to look for
gcov AND lcov (do we really need both?) AND genhtml, and error out
if they're not present, even if you didn't say --enable-coverage.
Please fix.
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: > > yeah the "code coverage" changes broke it - the buildfarm dashboard is > > pretty telling: > > Yes --- it looks like the configure.in patch is designed to look for > gcov AND lcov (do we really need both?) AND genhtml, and error out > if they're not present, even if you didn't say --enable-coverage. > Please fix. gcov and lcov do different things; they are both needed. lcov is a GNU extension of gcov, which generates the HTML pages. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: >> > yeah the "code coverage" changes broke it - the buildfarm dashboard is >> > pretty telling: >> >> Yes --- it looks like the configure.in patch is designed to look for >> gcov AND lcov (do we really need both?) AND genhtml, and error out >> if they're not present, even if you didn't say --enable-coverage. >> Please fix. > > gcov and lcov do different things; they are both needed. lcov is a GNU > extension of gcov, which generates the HTML pages. just confirmed that this is fixed. merlin