I'm working over Pavel's FOR-over-cursor patch: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2007-12/msg00001.php (Although I previously complained that this was a bit pointless, the argument that it's important for porting Oracle code won me over.) I noticed that because the patch uses the same prefetch logic that regular plpgsql FOR loops do, the "current row" as seen by the cursor itself is typically not in sync with the current row of the loop. This would mean in particular that UPDATE/DELETE WHERE CURRENT OF would affect the "wrong" row of the table. This is fixable by not prefetching, but at a performance cost. I wonder whether anyone knows if Oracle users expect this combination to work at all? regards, tom lane
I wrote:
> I wonder whether anyone knows
> if Oracle users expect this combination to work at all?
Nevermind that ... I found an example of this in Oracle's own docs,
so clearly it had better work. Patch applied with appropriate fixes.
regards, tom lane
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера