Обсуждение: buildfarm member tapir failing PLCheck in 8.1 branch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

buildfarm member tapir failing PLCheck in 8.1 branch

От
Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
I noticed that tapir is failing the plpython PLCheck test in the 8.1
branch.  I was worried for a jiffy that it could be related to my
changes of yesterday, but on looking closer it seems it has been failing
for quite a while ..

Hmm, oh, and in looking even closer, the reason it's not failing in 8.2
and HEAD seems to be that we added new alternative output to match
Python 2.5.

Should we add the plpython_error_3.out file to 8.1?

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                               http://www.PlanetPostgreSQL.org/
"Investigación es lo que hago cuando no sé lo que estoy haciendo"
(Wernher von Braun)


Re: buildfarm member tapir failing PLCheck in 8.1 branch

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org> writes:
> I noticed that tapir is failing the plpython PLCheck test in the 8.1
> branch.  I was worried for a jiffy that it could be related to my
> changes of yesterday, but on looking closer it seems it has been failing
> for quite a while ..

> Hmm, oh, and in looking even closer, the reason it's not failing in 8.2
> and HEAD seems to be that we added new alternative output to match
> Python 2.5.

> Should we add the plpython_error_3.out file to 8.1?

That's not the only change that would need to be made to support python
2.5 in 8.1.  I suggested back-patching here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00715.php
but there wasn't any enthusiasm for it.

What might make more sense is to encourage buildfarm owners not to
bother testing combinations that we have decided won't be supported.
For instance, I wouldn't mind seeing a mass decommissioning of pre-8.2
Windows testing; the intermittent failures we see on those machines
--- mostly stats tests, eg here
http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=narwhal&dt=2007-11-23%2005:00:01
--- aren't ever going to be fixed, and they distract attention
from problems that we might like to fix.
        regards, tom lane