Обсуждение: ERROR: index row size

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

ERROR: index row size

От
"Rodrigo Sakai"
Дата:

  Hello,

 

  I’m having a big trouble with the index size! I have looked for a solution in the internet, but the solutions that I found don’t fit for me!

  I developed a new data type using C and add this new type on PostgreSQL. Basically, the data type is: (DateADT, DateADT) with some temporal rules that I’m researching! The data type is ok; the in, out, receive and send functions are ok; some operations are ok. But the index operators and functions are not working properly! Actually I can use them, but in some cases an error occurs about index row size.

  I’m sure that the functions in, out, receive and send are well implemented. I think the problem is that the data type is really big and needs a “big index”.

 

  The implementation code of the data type is::

 

typedef struct t_periodo

{

            DateADT                       tvi;

            DateADT                       tvf;

}           Periodo;

 

 

  Any ideas to solve my problem? Perhaps increasing the BLOCKSIZE could be one solution. Not very smart one, but can solve temporally my problem?!?!

 

  Thanks in advance!

Re: ERROR: index row size

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
"Rodrigo Sakai" <rodrigo.sakai@poli.usp.br> writes:
>   I developed a new data type using C and add this new type on PostgreSQL.
> Basically, the data type is: (DateADT, DateADT) with some temporal rules
> that I'm researching! The data type is ok; the in, out, receive and send
> functions are ok; some operations are ok. But the index operators and
> functions are not working properly! Actually I can use them, but in some
> cases an error occurs about index row size.

You have a bug in your datatype code.  There's no way an 8-byte datatype
should produce that error.
        regards, tom lane


Re: ERROR: index row size

От
Mark Kirkwood
Дата:
Rodrigo Sakai wrote:
>   Hello,
> 
>  
> 
>   I’m having a big trouble with the index size! I have looked for a 
> solution in the internet, but the solutions that I found don’t fit for me!
> 

I would guess you have an allocation calculation error/memory leak 
somewhere in your implementation - maybe post a link to the actual C 
code (in case someone wants to have a look at it for you)!

(Valgrind might help you here, otherwise you can set a few breakpoints 
in gdb and check what is going on).

Cheers

Mark