Re: 8.2 open items list
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>
Дата:
Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Neil Conway writes: >> > Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects >> > into the pg_catalog schema: >> >> Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought >> the conclusion was to leave it as-is. > > Yes, that is my recollection too. > At the very least there is no consensus to do anything else. cheers andrew
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Дата:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 01:24 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > I have update the 8.2 open items list:
> > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems
>
> The Win32-bison-version-check thing is done, and we already renamed
> those xid columns.
What is the ISN problem?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>
Дата:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 09:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" writes:
> > What is the ISN problem?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00245.php
Ty.
J
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Дата:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 00:45 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems Is there a compelling reason to try to get the to_char() patch into 8.2? -Neil
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>
Дата:
On Thu, 2006-11-23 at 00:45 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects into the pg_catalog schema: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-10/msg01049.php -Neil
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
"Joshua D. Drake" writes: > What is the ISN problem? http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00245.php regards, tom lane
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Neil Conway writes: > Is there a compelling reason to try to get the to_char() patch into 8.2? This patch appears to be a reimplementation of code that was added in 8.2 --- before that we didn't try to localize month/day names at all. If we think the code currently in HEAD is wrong, it would be better to fix it now instead of having a behavior change in 8.2 and another one in 8.3. regards, tom lane
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Neil Conway writes: > Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects > into the pg_catalog schema: Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought the conclusion was to leave it as-is. regards, tom lane
8.2 open items list
От:
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Дата:
I have update the 8.2 open items list: http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Дата:
Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" writes: > > What is the ISN problem? > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00245.php I have added a URL column to the open items list. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Дата:
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway writes: > > Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects > > into the pg_catalog schema: > > Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought > the conclusion was to leave it as-is. Yes, that is my recollection too. -- Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Дата:
Bruce, Will have some kind of DTrace docs by tommorrow. Sorry, I was hoping that Robert would have a draft, and he was hoping that I would. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>
Дата:
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway writes: >> Also, we still need a resolution for contrib/adminpack placing objects >> into the pg_catalog schema: > > Well, there was a lot of difference of opinion on that, but I thought > the conclusion was to leave it as-is. Yes, that was what i thought when I reviewed the thread last time this was re-raised: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00164.php I will also point out the pgAdmin 1.6 has now been released so incompatible changes in this area now *will* mean functionality regressions for users of 8.2 over users of 8.1 and 8.0, especially on Windows where adminpack has always been bundled. Regards, Dave
Re: 8.2 open items list
От:
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Дата:
Bruce Momjian writes: > I have update the 8.2 open items list: > http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgopenitems The Win32-bison-version-check thing is done, and we already renamed those xid columns. regards, tom lane