both cube and seg seems to do some funky stuff with flex/bison, if I'm not entirely mistaken. Cube, for example, uses a rule that builds "cubeparse.o" from "cubescan.c". (which in turnis built from flex/bison files). Is there any reason why we don't build a file called "cubescan.o" from "cubescan.c" and thus simplify the rules a bit? //Magnus
> both cube and seg seems to do some funky stuff with > flex/bison, if I'm not entirely mistaken. Cube, for example, > uses a rule that builds "cubeparse.o" from "cubescan.c". > (which in turnis built from flex/bison files). > > Is there any reason why we don't build a file called > "cubescan.o" from "cubescan.c" and thus simplify the rules a bit? Hmm. I shold recall this one. I'm just reading the makefile wrong - all it says is that there is a dependency between them. Oops. Time to crawl back under that rock... //magnus
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера