Обсуждение: Timezone List
Any chance for a DB Client accessible list of allowable time zones? I've been told that the only way to get at this list is by looking through the source and lifting the list from zone.tab. While I'm at it, how about an accessible list of country codes? I know that it's not core db functionality, but these lists are so universally useful that making users parse the files and store them in tables seems silly. What are other people's thoughts on this? Good idea or not?
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 04:07:58AM +1000, Naz Gassiep wrote: > Any chance for a DB Client accessible list of allowable time zones? I've > been told that the only way to get at this list is by looking through > the source and lifting the list from zone.tab. In the CVS version there is a table with this information: http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html > While I'm at it, how about an accessible list of country codes? I know > that it's not core db functionality, but these lists are so universally > useful that making users parse the files and store them in tables seems > silly. Err, where does postgres use this information? I beleive there is a project on pgfoundary that has some standard datasets. Hope this helps, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > In the CVS version there is a table with this information: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html > > Great, thanks for that > Err, where does postgres use this information? I beleive there is a > project on pgfoundary that has some standard datasets. > Currently, it is stored in /src/timezone/data/iso3166.tab and I propose to have it available in a system view or something similar. This data is as useful as the available timezones, although I concede that it is not part of PG functionality and this may be more appropriate as a simple file that can be psql -f'd into the database if users need it as part of an app. It's more "developer helper data" than "database functionlity" and hence it could be more appropriate to distribute through the support community rather than as part of the postgresql core. Comments?
Naz Gassiep <naz@mira.net> writes:
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>> Err, where does postgres use this information? I beleive there is a
>> project on pgfoundary that has some standard datasets.
>>
> Currently, it is stored in /src/timezone/data/iso3166.tab and I propose
> to have it available in a system view or something similar.
Hm. I wasn't aware that that was present in the zic database; it's not
something used by or even exposed to the rest of the system. I would
not support adding code that depends on it being there.
regards, tom lane
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > In the CVS version there is a table with this information: > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output. It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2 we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for the other view. regards, tom lane
> Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not > the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes > me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code > similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output. > > It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is > sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2 > we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view > is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or > more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for > the other view. > > regards, tom lane > I agree with having two views, and I also think that the name as it is, is not right. I agree with pg_timezone_abbrevs and pg_timezone_names or similar. On a related note, there is not a one:one relationship between abbreviations and zone names, some abbreviations are used by two zones (forex "EST", "CST" and others are used in Australia and the Americas) and currently it is a server configuration directive (australian_timezones) to assume Australian or American zones in the case of ambiguity. I don't know about anyone else, but the whole australian_timezones thing seems like an ugly hackaround to me. I do not have a proposed solution to this, but I see a non-trivial risk of an application being re-deployed on a server where the admin forgets to change this directive resulting in all kinds of fun and games. Forgive me if this is an already-discussed issue. I am also rather baffled at the way "SAT" is changed from being interpreted as a day of the week in one mode, and a timezone in another. This seems an awful incongruity of behavior, and "SAT" should be interpreted as a timezone in both modes. If it must be done, switching of this behavior doesn't fit in with the purpose of the australian_timezones directive and should be made the subject of a different directive (e.g., sat_is_timezone(boolean) or something similar). SAT should, IMHO, always be considered a timezone and use of the "SAT" string by DB programmers should be just another case for care as with any other SQL keyword.
Naz Gassiep <naz@mira.net> writes:
> I don't know about anyone else, but the whole australian_timezones thing
> seems like an ugly hackaround to me.
You really shouldn't be pontificating about this if you haven't been
paying attention to recent development work ;-)
regards, tom lane
> >> I don't know about anyone else, but the whole australian_timezones thing >> seems like an ugly hackaround to me. >> > > You really shouldn't be pontificating about this if you haven't been > paying attention to recent development work ;-) > > regards, tom lane Aah, sorry, I don't watch dev progress very closely. This is something that has been bugging me since 7.4.x branch and I never got around to whining about it. Consider my comments retracted. - Naz
> > In the CVS version there is a table with this information: > > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames. > > html > > Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset > abbreviations, not the full zone names that you could use > with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes me that we should have a view > for that as well. We could use code similar to > scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output. You know, I think I suggested that back in the days when I worked on the replacement timezone code, and you didn't want it back then ;-) If you think it's good now then yes, I still think it is. I may even have the code for it around somewhere if I go look a bit... Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze, want me to look for it? > It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because > pg_timezonenames is sitting on the obvious name for such a > view, and once we release 8.2 we won't be able to change it. > On reflection I think the existing view is wrongly named --- > perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or more readably, > perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for the > other view. Seems reasonable - my vote is for the more readable version. //Magnus
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 05:29:04AM +1000, Naz Gassiep wrote: > I am also rather baffled at the way "SAT" is changed from being > interpreted as a day of the week in one mode, and a timezone in another. Ugh. It'd be an argument if people actually used SAT as a timezone. They don't, it's ACST. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze, want me
> to look for it?
Yeah, please take a look --- seeing the size of the code will probably
help us decide if it's too late for 8.2 or not.
regards, tom lane
On 2006-09-06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: >> In the CVS version there is a table with this information: >> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html > > Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not > the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes > me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code > similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output. Any view over the full timezone names should also include the corresponding data from zone.tab in the timezone library source. > It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is > sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2 > we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view > is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or > more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for > the other view. Yes, the abbreviations table is definitely misnamed. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: > > In the CVS version there is a table with this information: > > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg-timezonenames.html > > Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset abbreviations, not > the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. It strikes > me that we should have a view for that as well. We could use code > similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view output. > > It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is > sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2 > we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view > is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or > more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for > the other view. I think 'abbrev' is a like unintuitive. How about 'short_names'? Gavin
> >> In the CVS version there is a table with this information: > >> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/view-pg- > timezonenames > >> .html > > > > Actually, what that view gives you is timezone offset > abbreviations, > > not the full zone names that you could use with SET TIME ZONE. > It > > strikes me that we should have a view for that as well. We could > use > > code similar to scan_available_timezones() to generate the view > output. > > Any view over the full timezone names should also include the > corresponding data from zone.tab in the timezone library source. Just noticed this mail, so that's not included in my patch. But couldn't we just load that file up in a separate table if needed, and then join with it when necessary? //Magnus
Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It's somewhat urgent to address this now, because pg_timezonenames is
>> sitting on the obvious name for such a view, and once we release 8.2
>> we won't be able to change it. On reflection I think the existing view
>> is wrongly named --- perhaps it should be pg_timezoneabbrevs? Or
>> more readably, perhaps pg_timezone_abbrevs, with pg_timezone_names for
>> the other view.
> I think 'abbrev' is a like unintuitive. How about 'short_names'?
I'm not wedded to "abbrevs", but I don't like "short_names" because it
suggests that the names in the one view are just shorter forms of the
names in the other view, whereas really they aren't comparable things
at all (eg, EDT and EST5EDT are very different animals, because the
latter includes a set of DST transition-date rules).
I suppose the same argument could be made against "abbrevs" of course,
but it seems stronger if we have "names" and "short_names".
regards, tom lane
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>>> Assuming we can sneak this in even though it's feature-freeze,
>>> want me to look for it?
>> Yeah, please take a look --- seeing the size of the code will
>> probably help us decide if it's too late for 8.2 or not.
> Here goes. Tested only on win32 so far, but works there. No docs yet
> either - need to know if it goes in first ;)
I've applied this along with some extra work to get it to show GMT
offsets and DST status, which should be useful for helping people
to choose which setting they want. This effectively obsoletes
Table B-5 as well as B-4 in the SGML docs ... we should probably
remove both of those in favor of recommending people look at the
views.
I did the basic documentation work in catalogs.sgml for these views,
but Appendix B still needs an update. Joachim, you were going to do
that, right?
regards, tom lane
"Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
>> Any view over the full timezone names should also include the
>> corresponding data from zone.tab in the timezone library source.
> Just noticed this mail, so that's not included in my patch.
BTW, now that the view is in, I can't help noticing that it shows 550
different zone names, while there are only 392 entries in the zone.tab
file. I conclude that the zic people don't take maintenance of zone.tab
very seriously, and hence that we probably shouldn't rely on it.
regards, tom lane
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:19:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I've applied this along with some extra work to get it to show GMT
> offsets and DST status, which should be useful for helping people
> to choose which setting they want. This effectively obsoletes
> Table B-5 as well as B-4 in the SGML docs ... we should probably
> remove both of those in favor of recommending people look at the
> views.
> I did the basic documentation work in catalogs.sgml for these views,
> but Appendix B still needs an update. Joachim, you were going to do
> that, right?
Thats right.
Joachim
--
Joachim Wieland joe@mcknight.de
GPG key available
On 2006-09-17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: >>> Any view over the full timezone names should also include the >>> corresponding data from zone.tab in the timezone library source. > >> Just noticed this mail, so that's not included in my patch. > > BTW, now that the view is in, I can't help noticing that it shows 550 > different zone names, while there are only 392 entries in the zone.tab > file. I conclude that the zic people don't take maintenance of zone.tab > very seriously, and hence that we probably shouldn't rely on it. You're jumping to conclusions there. Eliminating the alias names (i.e. anything not in the form Continent/*), we get only 45 differences, of which 40 are backward-compatibility aliases (see the "backward" source file). The remaining five are: Asia/Riyadh87Asia/Riyadh88Asia/Riyadh89 (the three Riyadh?? zones are local solar time for specific years)Asia/Istanbul (alias for Europe/Istanbul)Europe/Nicosia (alias for Asia/Nicosia) So the list in zone.tab _is_ complete, it just doesn't list aliases (which it isn't supposed to). The reason to include zone.tab in with the data (unlike the current setup which doesn't bother to even install the file anywhere) is to provide an answer to the question "what timezone(s) are applicable to a specific country". For that purpose aliases are irrelevent. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services
On Sat, Sep 16, 2006 at 04:19:48PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net> writes: > > Here goes. Tested only on win32 so far, but works there. No docs yet > > either - need to know if it goes in first ;) > I've applied this along with some extra work to get it to show GMT > offsets and DST status, which should be useful for helping people > to choose which setting they want. This effectively obsoletes > Table B-5 as well as B-4 in the SGML docs ... we should probably > remove both of those in favor of recommending people look at the > views. http://momjian.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/view-pg-timezone-names.html says that the names in the view are "recognized" as argument to "SET TIMEZONE". However some of them can still not be used if they contain leap seconds, try for example set timezone to 'Mideast/Riyadh87'; Should we just document that some can't be set or remove those from the view completely or add another boolean column has_leapsecs or similar? Removing them seems not to be the right idea because you can say: select now() at time zone 'Mideast/Riyadh87'; Joachim -- Joachim Wieland joe@mcknight.de GPG key available