Sorry, my fault, just mistyped the function name
in PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1() macro.
--strk;
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 11:08:28AM +0100, strk wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a trigger within 8.0.0RC2.
> I get a segfault when the trigger is fired, valgrind
> reports an illegal read being the line:
>
> TriggerData *trigdata = (TriggerData *) fcinfo->context;
>
> Valgrind reports:
>
> ==941== Use of uninitialised value of size 4
> ==941== at 0x3CD9C197: cache_bbox (lwgeom_triggers.c:10)
> ==941== by 0x825C274: fmgr_oldstyle (fmgr.c:637)
> ==941== by 0x81258C8: ExecCallTriggerFunc (trigger.c:1149)
> ==941== by 0x812646F: ExecBRUpdateTriggers (trigger.c:1525)
>
> Isn't fmgr_oldstyle the Version 0 function caller ?
> Shouldn't triggers be defined as Version 1 ?
>
> TIA
>
> --strk;
>
> For standing up against patentability of software,
>
> Thank You, Poland!
>
> Read the intervention: http://kwiki.ffii.org/ConsPolon041221En
> Send your thanks: thankyoupoland.info
> Read/do more: http://www.noepatents.org/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
--
For standing up against patentability of software,
Thank You, Poland!
Read the intervention: http://kwiki.ffii.org/ConsPolon041221En
Send your thanks: thankyoupoland.info
Read/do more: http://www.noepatents.org/