Обсуждение: Re: [SQL] [ADMIN] Syslog

On 14 Mar 2002 21:17:05 +0000
"Oliver Elphick" <olly@lfix.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 2002-03-14 at 20:13, Jie Liang wrote:
> > I did everything as you did, however, when start the postmaster,
> > I got following:
> > FATAL 1:    'syslog' is not a valid option name.
>
> Then you haven't configured postgresql with --enable-syslog.  (That
> message comes from src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c, if you want
> confirmation.)
Hackers: Is there any reason to NOT make --enable-syslog the default
any more?

I.E. can we change the sense of it to be --disable-syslog and have
USE_SYSLOG defined by default?


>
> --
> Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
> Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
> GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839  932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C
>
>      "Let your light so shine before men, that they may see
>       your good works, and glorify your Father which is in
>       heaven."         Matthew 5:16
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>


--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes:
> Hackers: Is there any reason to NOT make --enable-syslog the default
> any more?
> I.E. can we change the sense of it to be --disable-syslog and have
> USE_SYSLOG defined by default?

I thought we'd agreed to do that already; at least Peter had indicated
he planned to do it.  I guess he didn't get around to it for 7.2.

            regards, tom lane