Обсуждение: ODBC & v7.0(Rel) Errors with Users and Databases
Hi,
I originally posted this problem to the interfaces list but have not had any
responses. I would like to resolve this as pgAdmin cannot manage users or
databases whilst this problem exists:
I have a problem with the use of CREATE/ALTER/DROP USER/DATABASE via ODBC
which was not there in v6.x.x. Any code that executes any of the SQL listed
results in an error along the lines of:
ERROR: DROP DATABASE: May not be called in a transaction block
The ODBC log (and knowledge that it isn't pgAdmin or M$ ADO) shows that the
ODBC driver is automatically wrapping the query in a transaction.
conn=47987408, query='BEGIN'
conn=47987408, query='DROP DATABASE "matt"'
ERROR from backend during send_query: 'ERROR: DROP DATABASE: May not be
called in a transaction block'
conn=47987408, query='COMMIT'
STATEMENT ERROR: func=SC_execute, desc='', errnum=1, errmsg='Error while
executing the query'
------------------------------------------------------------ hdbc=47987408, stmt=49221232, result=0
manual_result=0, prepare=0, internal=0 bindings=0, bindings_allocated=0
parameters=0,parameters_allocated=0 statement_type=6, statement='DROP DATABASE "matt"'
stmt_with_params='DROPDATABASE "matt"' data_at_exec=-1, current_exec_param=-1, put_data=0
currTuple=-1,current_col=-1, lobj_fd=-1 maxRows=0, rowset_size=1, keyset_size=0, cursor_type=0,
scroll_concurrency=1 cursor_name='SQL_CUR02EF0E70' ----------------QResult Info
-------------------------------
CONN ERROR: func=SC_execute, desc='', errnum=110, errmsg='ERROR: DROP
DATABASE: May not be called in a transaction block'
------------------------------------------------------------ henv=47987392, conn=47987408, status=1,
num_stmts=16 sock=47980304, stmts=47980352, lobj_type=27904 ---------------- Socket Info
------------------------------- socket=488, reverse=0, errornumber=0, errormsg='(NULL)'
buffer_in=47993744,buffer_out=47997848 buffer_filled_in=3, buffer_filled_out=0, buffer_read_in=2
conn=47987408, SQLDisconnect
Any thoughts/suggestions would be welcomed!!
Regards,
Dave.
--
"If you stand still, sooner or later something will eat you." - James Burke
http://www.vale-housing.co.uk/ (Work)
http://www.pgadmin.freeserve.co.uk/ (Home of pgAdmin)
Dave Page writes:
> ERROR: DROP DATABASE: May not be called in a transaction block
This command can't be rolled back so you aren't allowed to try. This was
thought as an improvement. In general, a database isn't a database object
so one shouldn't be transacting around with them. (Same goes for users.)
> The ODBC log (and knowledge that it isn't pgAdmin or M$ ADO) shows that the
> ODBC driver is automatically wrapping the query in a transaction.
I don't know anything about ODBC but it certainly should provide a means
to execute a command without that wrapping block. Is this a special
function or do you just execute some exec("DROP DATABASE") style call?
--
Peter Eisentraut Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net 75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/ Sweden
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e@gmx.net]
> Sent: 17 May 2000 17:18
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: 'pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org'
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC & v7.0(Rel) Errors with Users and
> Databases
>
>
> Dave Page writes:
>
> > ERROR: DROP DATABASE: May not be called in a transaction block
>
> This command can't be rolled back so you aren't allowed to
> try. This was
> thought as an improvement. In general, a database isn't a
> database object
> so one shouldn't be transacting around with them. (Same goes
> for users.)
This makes perfect sense of course.
> > The ODBC log (and knowledge that it isn't pgAdmin or M$
> ADO) shows that the
> > ODBC driver is automatically wrapping the query in a transaction.
>
> I don't know anything about ODBC but it certainly should
> provide a means
> to execute a command without that wrapping block. Is this a special
> function or do you just execute some exec("DROP DATABASE") style call?
Yes, I just issue the DROP DATABASE sql exactly as I would issue and INSERT,
DELETE or UPDATE query. From my fumblings around in the source for the ODBC
driver I have found what I believe to be the offending code in statement.c
at line 748 in the version shipped with 7.0, however I know nothing about
how the driver works and my C is far from good so (having very little spare
time also) I'm reluctant to try to fix it myself:
/* Begin a transaction if one is not already in progress *//* The reason is because we can't use declare/fetch
cursors
without starting a transaction first.*/if ( ! self->internal && ! CC_is_in_trans(conn) &&
(globals.use_declarefetch || STMT_UPDATE(self))) {
mylog(" about to begin a transaction on statement = %u\n",
self); res = CC_send_query(conn, "BEGIN", NULL);
Again, any assistance would be greatfully received!
Regards,
Dave.
--
"If you stand still, sooner or later something will eat you." - James Burke
http://www.vale-housing.co.uk/ (Work)
http://www.pgadmin.freeserve.co.uk/ (Home of pgAdmin)
> Again, any assistance would be greatfully received!
I'm extremely busy this week, but if the problem still exists next
week I'll plan on taking a look at it. Sorry that the time just isn't
there at the moment :(
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
South Pasadena, California