Обсуждение: Should pg_dump refuse to run if DB has different version?
If you run 6.5 pg_dump against a 7.0 database, or vice versa,
you get very obscure error messages:parseNumericArray: too many numbersgetInherits(): SELECT failed. Explanation from
backend:'ERROR: Attribute 'inhrel' not found
(Quick, guess which is which ... you'll probably guess wrong.)
It's too late to do anything about the behavior of 6.5 pg_dump,
but we could change 7.0 and later pg_dump to check the database
version at startup and refuse to run if it's not the expected value.
A downside is that a pg_dump might refuse to dump a DB that it actually
would work with; that could be a pain in the neck, particularly in
development scenarios where you might not have kept the previous
compilation of pg_dump lying around. Yet I think I prefer that to the
risk of an insidious incompatibility that causes pg_dump to run without
complaint yet generate a bogus dump.
Comments anyone?
regards, tom lane
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > If you run 6.5 pg_dump against a 7.0 database, or vice versa, > you get very obscure error messages: > parseNumericArray: too many numbers > getInherits(): SELECT failed. Explanation from backend: 'ERROR: Attribute 'inhrel' not found > (Quick, guess which is which ... you'll probably guess wrong.) > > It's too late to do anything about the behavior of 6.5 pg_dump, > but we could change 7.0 and later pg_dump to check the database > version at startup and refuse to run if it's not the expected value. > > A downside is that a pg_dump might refuse to dump a DB that it actually > would work with; that could be a pain in the neck, particularly in > development scenarios where you might not have kept the previous > compilation of pg_dump lying around. Yet I think I prefer that to the > risk of an insidious incompatibility that causes pg_dump to run without > complaint yet generate a bogus dump. > > Comments anyone? Sounds reasonable to me ...
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [000403 12:18] wrote: > If you run 6.5 pg_dump against a 7.0 database, or vice versa, > you get very obscure error messages: > parseNumericArray: too many numbers > getInherits(): SELECT failed. Explanation from backend: 'ERROR: Attribute 'inhrel' not found > (Quick, guess which is which ... you'll probably guess wrong.) > > It's too late to do anything about the behavior of 6.5 pg_dump, > but we could change 7.0 and later pg_dump to check the database > version at startup and refuse to run if it's not the expected value. > > A downside is that a pg_dump might refuse to dump a DB that it actually > would work with; that could be a pain in the neck, particularly in > development scenarios where you might not have kept the previous > compilation of pg_dump lying around. Yet I think I prefer that to the > risk of an insidious incompatibility that causes pg_dump to run without > complaint yet generate a bogus dump. > > Comments anyone? It's a great idea and later down the road the versioning information could be used to determine if it's actually possible to pg_dump with a certain version, ie the pg_dump program can report its version number to postgresql and postgresql can reply if it thinks it's compatible with the version of pg_dump being used. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
Ed Loehr <eloehr@austin.rr.com> writes:
> How about a pg_dump "force" option to run regardless of potential
> incompatibilities?
Good idea --- done.
regards, tom lane
Peter Eisentraut <e99re41@DoCS.UU.SE> writes:
>> A downside is that a pg_dump might refuse to dump a DB that it actually
>> would work with;
> Well, the fact remains that 6.5 (and probably earlier) pg_dump doesn't
> work with 7.0 databases unless you fix the getInherits() function to do
> different things with different backends. Or what did you mean with "would
> actually work"?
I was just speculating about possible future problems. Given the code
I committed last night, a 7.0 pg_dump will refuse to run with a 7.1
database (or vice versa, unless we change the version-checking code
before 7.1 is released). Now maybe that combination would have worked
anyway --- but we don't know yet.
I did put in a switch to override the version check, so if you know it
will work you can use that switch.
regards, tom lane