Обсуждение: ...

--- src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in.orig    Thu Jul  8 00:10:39 1999
+++ src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in    Thu Jul  8 10:26:12 1999
@@ -27,9 +27,7 @@# because of our inclusion of c.h and we don't know how to stop that.ifeq ($(CXX), g++)
-CXXFLAGS= -Wno-error
-else
-CXXFLAGS=
+CXXFLAGS+= -Wno-errorendifCXXFLAGS+=   -I$(SRCDIR)/backend \
@@ -52,10 +50,6 @@# Shared library stuff, also default 'all' targetinclude $(SRCDIR)/Makefile.shlib
-
-
-# Pull shared-lib CFLAGS into CXXFLAGS
-CXXFLAGS+= $(CFLAGS).PHONY: examples
--- src/template/generic.orig    Sat Jul 10 02:09:44 1999
+++ src/template/generic    Sat Jul 10 09:50:54 1999
@@ -1,10 +1,7 @@AROPT:crs
-CFLAGS:
-SHARED_LIB:ALL:SRCH_INC:SRCH_LIB:USE_LOCALE:no
-DLSUFFIX:.soYFLAGS:-dYACC:
--- src/pl/tcl/mkMakefile.tcldefs.sh.in.orig    Sat Jul 10 14:09:52 1999
+++ src/pl/tcl/mkMakefile.tcldefs.sh.in    Sat Jul 10 14:15:50 1999
@@ -6,11 +6,11 @@    exit 1fi
+# Strip outer quotes from variable and expand ${VAR} to $(VAR) for
+# interpretation by makecat @TCL_CONFIG_SH@ |    egrep '^TCL_|^TK_' |
-    while read inp
-    do
-        eval eval echo $inp
-    done >Makefile.tcldefs
+    sed -e "s/^\([^=]*\)='\(.*\)'$/\1=\2/g" \
+    -e 's/\${\([^}][^}]*\)}/$(\1)/g' >Makefile.tcldefsexit 0

pgsql-hackers@thewrittenword.com writes:
> --- src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in.orig    Thu Jul  8 00:10:39 1999
> +++ src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in    Thu Jul  8 10:26:12 1999
> -# Pull shared-lib CFLAGS into CXXFLAGS
> -CXXFLAGS+= $(CFLAGS)

Albert, if you're going to send in patches that potentially break things
on some platforms, you'd better include an explanation of why you think
the change is a good idea.
        regards, tom lane

On Sun, Jul 11, 1999 at 12:17:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> pgsql-hackers@thewrittenword.com writes:
> > --- src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in.orig    Thu Jul  8 00:10:39 1999
> > +++ src/interfaces/libpq++/Makefile.in    Thu Jul  8 10:26:12 1999
> > -# Pull shared-lib CFLAGS into CXXFLAGS
> > -CXXFLAGS+= $(CFLAGS)
> 
> Albert, if you're going to send in patches that potentially break things
> on some platforms, you'd better include an explanation of why you think
> the change is a good idea.

I accidentally sent the wrong patch. Sorry.

>             regards, tom lane

-- 
albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com)