Обсуждение: results of regression tests: NetBSD/i386 v1.3
Now that I have run the regression tests for 6.3 on a NetBSD/i386 v1.3 box I am wondering what to do with them. Should they be used as a source for bug fixes before the next release? If so, how should they be used? By me only, or should I post them somewhere for others to review? Cheers, Brook
> Now that I have run the regression tests for 6.3 on a NetBSD/i386 v1.3 > box I am wondering what to do with them. Should they be used as a > source for bug fixes before the next release? If so, how should they > be used? By me only, or should I post them somewhere for others to > review? Do they illustrate platform-specific bugs? If not, then we all can use our own platforms for these examples. If the differences are platform-specific, but expected, then perhaps Marc would like to get these for his "OS-specific" regression test comparisons?? - Tom
Do they illustrate platform-specific bugs? If not, then we all can use our own platforms for these examples. I'm not sure how I would recognize platform-specific bugs since I only have one platform. In the past I've ignored them, but I just thought this might be the time to point out problems that need attention in case they are something unusual. Diffs from the expected output yield things like: - ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Math result not representable + ERROR: pg_atoi: error reading "100000": Result too large - ERROR: Bad float8 input format '10e-400' + ERROR: Bad float8 input format '-10e-400' + ERROR: check_fkeys2_pkey_exist: tuple references non-existing key in pkeys + ERROR: check_fkeys_pkey_exist: tuple references non-existing key in pkeys - NOTICE: check_pkeys_fkey_cascade: 1 tuple(s) of fkeys2 are deleted + ERROR: check_fkeys2_fkey_restrict: tuple referenced in fkeys - ERROR: Cannot insert a duplicate key into a unique index - NOTICE: Non-functional update, only first update is performed If these are general diffs, I'll ignore them; otherwise, I'll be glad to give more specific information. Cheers, Brook
> Do they illustrate platform-specific bugs? If not, then we all can use > our own platforms for these examples. > > I'm not sure how I would recognize platform-specific bugs since I only > have one platform. In the past I've ignored them, but I just thought > this might be the time to point out problems that need attention in > case they are something unusual. > > Diffs from the expected output yield things like: > <snip> These are typical platform-specific differences, and are expected. The last few examples are from the trigger tests, which are going to be revisited before v6.3 release by Vadim (I hope :). - Tom
Thomas G. Lockhart wrote: > > > Do they illustrate platform-specific bugs? If not, then we all can use > > our own platforms for these examples. > > > > I'm not sure how I would recognize platform-specific bugs since I only > > have one platform. In the past I've ignored them, but I just thought > > this might be the time to point out problems that need attention in > > case they are something unusual. > > > > Diffs from the expected output yield things like: > > <snip> > > These are typical platform-specific differences, and are expected. The last few > examples are from the trigger tests, which are going to be revisited before v6.3 > release by Vadim (I hope :). Results are the same as in 6.2.1 expected. So, I just put 6.2.1 expected into 6.3 expected (with WARN: --> ERROR: translation). Should be ok now. Let's know if not. Vadim