Обсуждение: Longest Common Subsequence in Postgres - Algorithm Challenge
I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each relation defines a sequence. I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this?
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Robert James <srobertjames@gmail.com> wrote: > I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one > indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each > relation defines a sequence. > > I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do > this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and > computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But > I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this? > > > -- > Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general Pl/R is the way to go,IMO. Or any supported language. Regards, Atri -- Regards, Atri l'apprenant
On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:09:26AM -0400, Robert James wrote: > I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one > indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each > relation defines a sequence. > > I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do > this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and > computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But > I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this? I'm not entirely sure I understand. Can you show us some sample data and expected output? Best regards, depesz
On 7/8/13, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:09:26AM -0400, Robert James wrote: >> I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one >> indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each >> relation defines a sequence. >> >> I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do >> this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and >> computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But >> I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this? > > I'm not entirely sure I understand. Can you show us some sample data and > expected output? Sure. Borrowing a good example from http://wordaligned.org/articles/longest-common-subsequence : Table A (val varchar primary key, pos integer): 1, "C" 2, "H" 3, "I" 4, "M" 5, "P" 6, "A" 7, "N" 8, "Z" 9, "E" 10, "E" Table B (val varchar primary key, pos integer): 1, "H" 2, "U" 3, "M" 4, "A" 5, "N" SELECT LongestCommonSubsequence(A,B): 1, "H" 2, "M" 3, "A" 4, "N" (Common chars are in upper case: cHiMpANzee HuMAN ) The std dynamic programming algorithm is described at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_subsequence_problem
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Robert James <srobertjames@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7/8/13, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:09:26AM -0400, Robert James wrote: >>> I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one >>> indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each >>> relation defines a sequence. >>> >>> I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do >>> this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and >>> computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But >>> I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this? >> >> I'm not entirely sure I understand. Can you show us some sample data and >> expected output? > > Sure. Borrowing a good example from > http://wordaligned.org/articles/longest-common-subsequence : > > Table A (val varchar primary key, pos integer): > 1, "C" > 2, "H" > 3, "I" > 4, "M" > 5, "P" > 6, "A" > 7, "N" > 8, "Z" > 9, "E" > 10, "E" > > Table B (val varchar primary key, pos integer): > 1, "H" > 2, "U" > 3, "M" > 4, "A" > 5, "N" > > SELECT LongestCommonSubsequence(A,B): > 1, "H" > 2, "M" > 3, "A" > 4, "N" > > (Common chars are in upper case: > cHiMpANzee > HuMAN > ) > > The std dynamic programming algorithm is described at > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_subsequence_problem Your best bet on that would be to implement using either a procedural language (plpython, plperl that are in core, or even another one), or a C function and install it on server side with an extension. I'll do the latter if I were you. Roughly such a function would take in arguments the OIDs of the functions to compare (or their relation name), and return a set of rows describing the longest sequence found. -- Michael
Dnia 9 lip 2013 o godz. 00:46 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> napisał(a): > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Robert James <srobertjames@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 7/8/13, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:09:26AM -0400, Robert James wrote: >>>> I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one >>>> indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each >>>> relation defines a sequence. >>>> >>>> I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do >>>> this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and >>>> computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But >>>> I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this? >>> >>> I'm not entirely sure I understand. Can you show us some sample data and >>> expected output? >> >> Sure. Borrowing a good example from >> http://wordaligned.org/articles/longest-common-subsequence : >> >> Table A (val varchar primary key, pos integer): >> 1, "C" >> 2, "H" >> 3, "I" >> 4, "M" >> 5, "P" >> 6, "A" >> 7, "N" >> 8, "Z" >> 9, "E" >> 10, "E" >> >> Table B (val varchar primary key, pos integer): >> 1, "H" >> 2, "U" >> 3, "M" >> 4, "A" >> 5, "N" >> >> SELECT LongestCommonSubsequence(A,B): >> 1, "H" >> 2, "M" >> 3, "A" >> 4, "N" >> >> (Common chars are in upper case: >> cHiMpANzee >> HuMAN >> ) >> >> The std dynamic programming algorithm is described at >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_subsequence_problem > Your best bet on that would be to implement using either a procedural > language (plpython, plperl that are in core, or even another one), or > a C function and install it on server side with an extension. I'll do > the latter if I were you. Roughly such a function would take in > arguments the OIDs of the functions to compare (or their relation > name), and return a set of rows describing the longest sequence found. > Also if you only need the length of lcs, you can derive it using the built in levenshtein with costs function
Though people talk about doing this in other languages, I think you can solve it in plain SQL if you wanted to. For one thing, you could start off using unordered set operations to make the problem space smaller, such as using set intersection to see what the common subSETs of values there are from each of the sequences, which SQL does quickly and easily, and then you can eliminate any subsequences from the original whose set of values don't match one of these common subsets, and only those would you then have to compare for order. -- Darren Duncan On 2013.07.08 1:04 PM, Robert James wrote: > On 7/8/13, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:09:26AM -0400, Robert James wrote: >>> I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one >>> indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each >>> relation defines a sequence. >>> >>> I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do >>> this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and >>> computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But >>> I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this? >> >> I'm not entirely sure I understand. Can you show us some sample data and >> expected output? > > Sure. Borrowing a good example from > http://wordaligned.org/articles/longest-common-subsequence : > > Table A (val varchar primary key, pos integer): > 1, "C" > 2, "H" > 3, "I" > 4, "M" > 5, "P" > 6, "A" > 7, "N" > 8, "Z" > 9, "E" > 10, "E" > > Table B (val varchar primary key, pos integer): > 1, "H" > 2, "U" > 3, "M" > 4, "A" > 5, "N" > > SELECT LongestCommonSubsequence(A,B): > 1, "H" > 2, "M" > 3, "A" > 4, "N" > > (Common chars are in upper case: > cHiMpANzee > HuMAN > ) > > The std dynamic programming algorithm is described at > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_subsequence_problem > >
On Monday, July 8, 2013, Robert James wrote:
On 7/8/13, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz@depesz.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 09:09:26AM -0400, Robert James wrote:
>> I have two relations, where each relation has two fields, one
>> indicating a name and one indicating a position. That is, each
>> relation defines a sequence.
>>
>> I need to determine their longest common subsequence. Yes, I can do
>> this by fetching all the data into Java (or any other language) and
>> computing it using the standard LCS dynamic programming language. But
>> I'd like to stay within Postgres. Is there any way to do this?
>
> I'm not entirely sure I understand. Can you show us some sample data and
> expected output?
Sure. Borrowing a good example from
http://wordaligned.org/articles/longest-common-subsequence :
Table A (val varchar primary key, pos integer):
1, "C"
2, "H"
3, "I"
4, "M"
5, "P"
6, "A"
7, "N"
8, "Z"
9, "E"
10, "E"
Table B (val varchar primary key, pos integer):
1, "H"
2, "U"
3, "M"
4, "A"
5, "N"
SELECT LongestCommonSubsequence(A,B):
1, "H"
2, "M"
3, "A"
4, "N"
(Common chars are in upper case:
cHiMpANzee
HuMAN
)
The std dynamic programming algorithm is described at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longest_common_subsequence_problem
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
To me it looks like:
Selecte distinct val from tablea join tableb using (val)