Обсуждение: User-defined Aggregate function and performance.
Hello.
I've tried asking this on the irc channel, without much success.
I'm trying to define a "weighted mean" aggregate using postgresql create
aggregate feature.
I've been able to quickly write the required pgsql code to get it
working, but after testing it on a sample 10000 rows table, it seems to
be approximately 6 to 10 times slower than pure sql.
My initial implementation was in pl/pgsql, and did not mark the
functions as immutable. I did so after a suggestion from an irc user,
but it did not change anything performance wise.
Any idea on how to make it faster ?
Here is the code:
create type _weighted_avg_type as (
running_sum numeric,
running_count numeric
);
create or replace function mul_sum (a _weighted_avg_type, amount
numeric, weight numeric) returns _weighted_avg_type as $$
select ((($1.running_sum + ($2 * $3)) , ($1.running_count + $3)
))::_weighted_avg_type;
$$ language sql immutable;
create or replace function final_sum (a _weighted_avg_type) returns
numeric as $$
SELECT CASE
WHEN $1.running_count = 0 THEN 0
ELSE $1.running_sum / $1.running_count
END;
$$ language sql immutable;
create aggregate weighted_avg (numeric, numeric)(
sfunc = mul_sum,
finalfunc = final_sum,
stype = _weighted_avg_type,
initcond = '(0,0)'
);
create temp table test as (select a::numeric, b::numeric from
generate_series(1, 100) as t1(a), generate_series(1, 100) as t2(b));
-- Custom aggregate
select weighted_avg(a, b) from test;
-- pure sql version
select case when sum(b::numeric) = 0 then 0 else sum(a::numeric *
b::numeric) / sum(b::numeric) end from test;
--
Ronan Dunklau
Ronan Dunklau <rdunklau@gmail.com> writes:
> I'm trying to define a "weighted mean" aggregate using postgresql create
> aggregate feature.
> I've been able to quickly write the required pgsql code to get it
> working, but after testing it on a sample 10000 rows table, it seems to
> be approximately 6 to 10 times slower than pure sql.
It might help to use a two-element array for the transition state,
instead of a custom composite type.
> My initial implementation was in pl/pgsql, and did not mark the
> functions as immutable. I did so after a suggestion from an irc user,
> but it did not change anything performance wise.
Those suggestions would possibly help for a function that's meant to be
inlined into larger SQL expressions, but they won't do much for an
aggregate support function. I'm not real sure, but I think plpgsql
might be faster in this context.
Another thing to think about is whether you really need type numeric
here. float8 would be a lot faster ... though you might have roundoff
issues.
regards, tom lane
On 02/04/2012 18:06, Tom Lane wrote: > Ronan Dunklau <rdunklau@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm trying to define a "weighted mean" aggregate using postgresql create >> aggregate feature. > >> I've been able to quickly write the required pgsql code to get it >> working, but after testing it on a sample 10000 rows table, it seems to >> be approximately 6 to 10 times slower than pure sql. > > It might help to use a two-element array for the transition state, > instead of a custom composite type. It does not change much. It seems that altering the transition state instead of building a new one does help, though. When altering the state, the composite type version seems to be faster. But it still much slower than the hand-written sql version. > >> My initial implementation was in pl/pgsql, and did not mark the >> functions as immutable. I did so after a suggestion from an irc user, >> but it did not change anything performance wise. > > Those suggestions would possibly help for a function that's meant to be > inlined into larger SQL expressions, but they won't do much for an > aggregate support function. I'm not real sure, but I think plpgsql > might be faster in this context. > > Another thing to think about is whether you really need type numeric > here. float8 would be a lot faster ... though you might have roundoff > issues. The "hand-written" sql using only built-in functions performs really well with numerics. Why do you suggest that it could be the bottleneck ? I solved the problem by writing a C extension for it: http://pgxn.org/dist/weighted_mean/1.0.0/ Regards, -- Ronan Dunklau