Обсуждение: alter column appears to work, but doesn't?
I just updated a table to have a larger column size as follows.
alter table attributes_log alter column attribute_name type varchar(48);
The size was previously 24.
iddb=> \d attributes
Table "iddb.attributes"
Column | Type | Modifiers
----------------+-----------------------+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
attribute_id | uuid | not null default (encode(pgcrypto.gen_random_bytes(16), 'hex'::text))::uuid
attribute_name | character varying(48) | not null
management | character varying(24) | not null default 'by_value'::character varying
iddb=> insert into attributes ( attribute_name ) values ( 'abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz' );
ERROR: value too long for type character varying(24)
I'm using PostgreSQL 9.0.4
I tried to replicate this with a new database and a simple table, but
could not.
I had to drop (and then recreate) three rules and a view on this table
before altering the column.
This is a production database, so I need to treat it gently.
--
Ron Peterson
Network & Systems Administrator
Mount Holyoke College
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso
Ron Peterson <rpeterso@mtholyoke.edu> writes:
> I just updated a table to have a larger column size as follows.
> alter table attributes_log alter column attribute_name type varchar(48);
How come this refers to "attributes_log" while your failing command is
an insert into "attributes"?
regards, tom lane
2011-09-05_15:03:00-0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Ron Peterson <rpeterso@mtholyoke.edu> writes: > > I just updated a table to have a larger column size as follows. > > > alter table attributes_log alter column attribute_name type varchar(48); > > How come this refers to "attributes_log" while your failing command is > an insert into "attributes"? That was a typo, sorry. Did do the same thing on original table. I did the same thing to attributes_log because I have rules that log data there from my original table on insert/update/delete. I just dropped my logging rules, stopped the database and restarted it, put my rules back in place, and now it works. Not sure why. Cached query plan? -- Ron Peterson Network & Systems Administrator Mount Holyoke College http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso
Ron Peterson <rpeterso@mtholyoke.edu> writes:
> I just dropped my logging rules, stopped the database and restarted it,
> put my rules back in place, and now it works. Not sure why. Cached
> query plan?
Maybe. We'd need a reproducible test case to do more than speculate
though.
regards, tom lane
2011-09-05_16:14:00-0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:
> Ron Peterson <rpeterso@mtholyoke.edu> writes:
> > I just dropped my logging rules, stopped the database and restarted it,
> > put my rules back in place, and now it works. Not sure why. Cached
> > query plan?
>
> Maybe. We'd need a reproducible test case to do more than speculate
> though.
Hi Tom,
I was able to reproduce this. DDL below. Probably more DDL than
necessary, but not sure what is or isn't relevant.
postgres=# drop rule attribute_insert_rule on attributes;
postgres=# drop rule attribute_update_rule on attributes;
postgres=# drop rule attribute_delete_rule on attributes;
postgres=# alter table attributes_log alter column attribute_name type varchar(50);
...then recreate rules below
postgres=# insert into attributes values ( repeat( 'x', 49 ) );
ERROR: value too long for type character varying(48)
CREATE TABLE attributes (
attribute_name
VARCHAR(48)
UNIQUE
NOT NULL
);
-- Attribute names can be inserted or deleted, but not changed.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION attribute_name_freeze_tf()
RETURNS TRIGGER
AS $$
BEGIN
IF (TG_OP = 'INSERT') THEN
IF NEW.attribute_name = OLD.attribute_name THEN
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
END IF;
RETURN NULL;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER attribute_name_freeze_t
BEFORE UPDATE ON attributes
FOR EACH ROW EXECUTE PROCEDURE attribute_name_freeze_tf();
CREATE TABLE attributes_log (
attribute_name
VARCHAR(48),
action
CHAR(6)
NOT NULL
CHECK( action IN ('insert', 'delete','update') ),
changed
TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE
NOT NULL
DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
);
CREATE RULE attribute_insert_rule AS
ON INSERT TO attributes
DO
(
INSERT INTO attributes_log (
attribute_name,
action )
VALUES (
new.attribute_name,
'insert' );
);
CREATE RULE attribute_update_rule AS
ON UPDATE TO attributes
DO
(
INSERT INTO attributes_log (
attribute_name,
action )
VALUES (
new.attribute_name,
'update' );
);
CREATE RULE attribute_delete_rule AS
ON DELETE TO attributes
DO
(
INSERT INTO attributes_log (
attribute_name,
action )
VALUES (
old.attribute_name,
'delete' );
);
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Ron Peterson
Network & Systems Administrator
Mount Holyoke College
http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~rpeterso
On Monday, September 05, 2011 1:48:58 pm Ron Peterson wrote: > 2011-09-05_16:14:00-0400 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > > Ron Peterson <rpeterso@mtholyoke.edu> writes: > > > I just dropped my logging rules, stopped the database and restarted it, > > > put my rules back in place, and now it works. Not sure why. Cached > > > query plan? > > > > Maybe. We'd need a reproducible test case to do more than speculate > > though. > > Hi Tom, > > I was able to reproduce this. DDL below. Probably more DDL than > necessary, but not sure what is or isn't relevant. > > postgres=# drop rule attribute_insert_rule on attributes; > postgres=# drop rule attribute_update_rule on attributes; > postgres=# drop rule attribute_delete_rule on attributes; > postgres=# alter table attributes_log alter column attribute_name type > varchar(50); ...then recreate rules below > postgres=# insert into attributes values ( repeat( 'x', 49 ) ); > ERROR: value too long for type character varying(48) > > I am not seeing where you change the varchar length in the table attributes. That is where the error is coming from. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
Phghght. Sorry, no, that didn't do it, I was typing too fast and skipped updating the attributes table. That was definitely not the case w/ my original database. Wasn't working. The table definition reported the update I made. Insert did not work. Dropping rules, restarting database, and recreating rules got it working. Dunno. -Ron-