Обсуждение: psql \du
Hi,
I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is
missing for the shortcut \du:
# \du
List of roles
Role name | Attributes | Member of
--------------+--------------+-----------
# \du+
List of roles
Role name | Attributes | Member of | Description
--------------+--------------+-----------+-------------
Where shall I place this info? Is this also a bug?
Cheers
Andy
On Thursday 16 July 2009 02:12:05 ANdreas Wenk wrote: > Hi, > > I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is > missing for the shortcut \du: > > # \du > List of roles > Role name | Attributes | Member of > --------------+--------------+----------- > > # \du+ > List of roles > Role name | Attributes | Member of | Description > --------------+--------------+-----------+------------- > > Where shall I place this info? Is this also a bug? Looks like the help is missing this info. If you could provide a patch that also fixes up the translations, that would be most helpful.
Peter Eisentraut schrieb: > On Thursday 16 July 2009 02:12:05 ANdreas Wenk wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is >> missing for the shortcut \du: >> >> # \du >> List of roles >> Role name | Attributes | Member of >> --------------+--------------+----------- >> >> # \du+ >> List of roles >> Role name | Attributes | Member of | Description >> --------------+--------------+-----------+------------- >> >> Where shall I place this info? Is this also a bug? > > Looks like the help is missing this info. If you could provide a patch that > also fixes up the translations, that would be most helpful. Moin, will be the first time for me but sure, I will do it ;-) Cheers Andy
Peter Eisentraut schrieb:
> On Thursday 16 July 2009 02:12:05 ANdreas Wenk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I recognized in psql using the internal help (\?) that the *+* sign is
>> missing for the shortcut \du:
>>
>> # \du
>> List of roles
>> Role name | Attributes | Member of
>> --------------+--------------+-----------
>>
>> # \du+
>> List of roles
>> Role name | Attributes | Member of | Description
>> --------------+--------------+-----------+-------------
>>
>> Where shall I place this info? Is this also a bug?
>
> Looks like the help is missing this info. If you could provide a patch that
> also fixes up the translations, that would be most helpful.
>
Hi,
here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not neccessary
because there is no change. Am I right?
---
src/bin/psql/help.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/bin/psql/help.c b/src/bin/psql/help.c
index 5f13b8a..8a541e6 100644
--- a/src/bin/psql/help.c
+++ b/src/bin/psql/help.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ slashUsage(unsigned short int pager)
fprintf(output, _(" \\ds[S+] [PATTERN] list sequences\n"));
fprintf(output, _(" \\dt[S+] [PATTERN] list tables\n"));
fprintf(output, _(" \\dT[S+] [PATTERN] list data types\n"));
- fprintf(output, _(" \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n"));
+ fprintf(output, _(" \\du[+] [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n"));
fprintf(output, _(" \\dv[S+] [PATTERN] list views\n"));
fprintf(output, _(" \\l[+] list all databases\n"));
fprintf(output, _(" \\z [PATTERN] same as \\dp\n"));
--
1.6.0.4
0001-extended-du-with-was-missing.patch (END)
Cheers
Andy
Andreas Wenk wrote: > here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not > neccessary because there is no change. Am I right? Not really. For example the spanish translation file has this: msgid " \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n" msgstr " \\du [PATRÓN] listar roles (usuarios)\n" and it needs to read instead: msgid " \\du[+] [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n" msgstr " \\du[+] [PATRÓN] listar roles (usuarios)\n" -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Andreas Wenk wrote: > >> here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not >> neccessary because there is no change. Am I right? > > Not really. For example the spanish translation file has this: > > msgid " \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n" > msgstr " \\du [PATRÓN] listar roles (usuarios)\n" > > and it needs to read instead: > > msgid " \\du[+] [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n" > msgstr " \\du[+] [PATRÓN] listar roles (usuarios)\n" > > first I want to mention, that I moved this to hackers list. And actually I realized that I have to make more changes. I have to change also the documentation. And the same change has to be made with \dg ... After your reply I understand now what Peter meant with changing the translation files also. I didn't have a look to them and did not know, that \du and \dg is also written there - my fault. I will provide a patch tomorrow. Thanks for everybody's patience with me - I am learning ... ;-) Cheers Andy
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Andreas Wenk wrote:
>> here is the patch for help.c . I think updating some translations is not
>> neccessary because there is no change. Am I right?
> Not really. For example the spanish translation file has this:
> msgid " \\du [PATTERN] list roles (users)\n"
> msgstr " \\du [PATR�N] listar roles (usuarios)\n"
We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files,
and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The
masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about
this?
regards, tom lane
Tom Lane wrote: > We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files, > and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The > masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about > this? I must admit I don't know :-) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > >> We've never before expected patch submitters to patch the .po files, >> and in fact I would have thought it would be useless to do so. The >> masters are not in our CVS. Why is Andreas being told to worry about >> this? > > I must admit I don't know :-) > hm - I don't wanna make it more complicate as it is ... Peter wrote as the first answer to this post to do so - so actually I could do it (I had a short look to the po files two minutes ago -> /src/bin/psql/po/). I leave the desicion up to ;-) Cheers Andy