Обсуждение: pg_dump with low priority?

We have a huge database which must be backed up every day with pg_dump. The problem is, it takes around half an hour to produce the dump file, and all other processes on the same box are starved for cycles (presumably due to I/O) during the dump. It's not just an inconvenience, it's now evolved into a serious problem that needs to be addressed.

Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I don't mind if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as long as other processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

Thank you for any advice,

Bryan

Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org> schrieb:
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I don't mind
> if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as long as other
> processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

You can use 'nice', see see the man-page.


Andreas
--
Really, I'm not out to destroy Microsoft. That will just be a completely
unintentional side effect. (Linus Torvalds)
Kaufbach, Saxony, Germany, Europe.              N 51.05082°, E 13.56889°

Bryan Field-Elliot <bryan_lists@netmeme.org> writes:

> We have a huge database which must be backed up every day with pg_dump.
> The problem is, it takes around half an hour to produce the dump file, and
> all other processes on the same box are starved for cycles (presumably due
> to I/O) during the dump. It's not just an inconvenience, it's now evolved
> into a serious problem that needs to be addressed.

You should probably use 'top' and 'vmstat' or 'iostat' to make sure
the problem is what you think it is.  Guessing is usually a bad idea.  :)

That said, I/O starvation is the most likely candidate.

> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I don't
> mind if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as long as
> other processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

Unfortunately, changing the CPU priority with 'nice' doesn't generally
affect I/O bandwidth (since an I/O bound process doesn't use much
CPU).  I think there has been some work on I/O priorities in the Linux
kernel, but I'm not sure where that is.

Are you putting the dump file on the same device as the database lives
on?  If so, moving it to a different device/controller would take some
of the write load off your database disk.

You could also send the dump file over the network to another machine
rather than saving it locally, which would do the above and also
(probably) slow down the whole dump process, depending on the relative
speeds of your disk and your network.

-Doug

On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 07:39, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> We have a huge database which must be backed up every day with
> pg_dump. The problem is, it takes around half an hour to produce the
> dump file, and all other processes on the same box are starved for
> cycles (presumably due to I/O) during the dump. It's not just an
> inconvenience, it's now evolved into a serious problem that needs to
> be addressed.
>
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a lower priority? I
> don't mind if the backup takes two hours instead of half an hour, as
> long as other processes were getting their fair share of cycles.

You could either set up plain old replication via slony / mammoth
replicator, and backup the slave, or setup Point in Time Recovery.

nice comes to mind:

nice pg_dump ...



On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 07:39, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote:
> We have a huge database which must be backed up
every day with
> pg_dump. The problem is, it takes around half an
hour to produce the
> dump file, and all other processes on the same box
are starved for
> cycles (presumably due to I/O) during the dump. It's
not just an
> inconvenience, it's now evolved into a serious
problem that needs to
> be addressed.
>
> Is there any mechanism for running pg_dump with a
lower priority? I
> don't mind if the backup takes two hours instead of
half an hour, as
> long as other processes were getting their fair
share of cycles.



__________________________________
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
http://farechase.yahoo.com

On 10/24/05, CSN <cool_screen_name90001@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> nice comes to mind:
>
> nice pg_dump ...
>

as mentioned earlier...nice isn't going to do anything for I/O. PITR
(point in time recovery) would be, in my opinion, the best solution to
this problem.

aaron.glenn