Hi, In the 7.4.5 version, the code is now trying to use a much larger value for shared_buffers. I can certainly set this to a lower number with the -B option. However, my guestion is: What is the performance issue with setting shared_buffers to something like 45? In doing some timing on my system, I cannot tell any difference with 45 versus 1000. Perhaps I am looking at the wrong performance criteria. Thanks, Glenn
Glenn Sullivan <glenn.sullivan@varianinc.com> writes:
> What is the performance issue with setting shared_buffers to something like 45?
> In doing some timing on my system, I cannot tell any difference with 45 versus 1000.
What are you timing exactly? Almost every benchmark I've ever seen is
much happier with shared_buffers of at least a few hundred. Otherwise
you spend too much time copying data between kernel and user space.
regards, tom lane
Сайт использует файлы cookie для корректной работы и повышения удобства. Нажимая кнопку «Принять» или продолжая пользоваться сайтом, вы соглашаетесь на их использование в соответствии с Политикой в отношении обработки cookie ООО «ППГ», в том числе на передачу данных из файлов cookie сторонним статистическим и рекламным службам. Вы можете управлять настройками cookie через параметры вашего браузера