Обсуждение: PostgreSQL and Fedora?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hi,

On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Daniel Secomb wrote:

> I'm curious to know whether PostgreSQL works well with Fedora RedHat Linux?
> If there are any issues, I would like to know about them.

I've 'just' installed 7.4.5 on FC 2. I also have a production server on
FC 1 also (well, a very small but very frequently updated database...).

There are no platform-specific issues that I can report, but let us know
if you experience some problems...

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org                devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
            http://www.tdmsoft.com
            http://www.gunduz.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBNehmtl86P3SPfQ4RAsbFAKCqcc1S9o7LJYq5/zqPrc5TGqia3QCfd9zw
a5EuC1sZ4PiGHN+VD+xQdKk=
=KOg1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Daniel Secomb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm curious to know whether PostgreSQL works well with Fedora RedHat Linux?
> If there are any issues, I would like to know about them.

No problems AFAICT, unless you want to run two different versions
simultaneously. Then you'll need to compile from source or tweak the
SRPM for the second.

--
   Richard Huxton
   Archonet Ltd

I am running it on an i686 SMP system using FC2 with no issues.

Terry Fielder
Manager Software Development and Deployment
Great Gulf Homes / Ashton Woods Homes
terry@greatgulfhomes.com
Fax: (416) 441-9085


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Devrim GUNDUZ
> Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 11:19 AM
> To: Daniel Secomb
> Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and Fedora?
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2 Sep 2004, Daniel Secomb wrote:
>
> > I'm curious to know whether PostgreSQL works well with
> Fedora RedHat Linux?
> > If there are any issues, I would like to know about them.
>
> I've 'just' installed 7.4.5 on FC 2. I also have a production
> server on
> FC 1 also (well, a very small but very frequently updated
> database...).
>
> There are no platform-specific issues that I can report, but
> let us know
> if you experience some problems...
>
> Regards,
> - --
> Devrim GUNDUZ
> devrim~gunduz.org
> devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
>             http://www.tdmsoft.com
>             http://www.gunduz.org
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFBNehmtl86P3SPfQ4RAsbFAKCqcc1S9o7LJYq5/zqPrc5TGqia3QCfd9zw
> a5EuC1sZ4PiGHN+VD+xQdKk=
> =KOg1
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>       subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so
> that your
>       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

We're running 7.4 on FC2 64bit in production, and 7.4 on FC2 32bit on two
different machines in testing.  No problems whatsoever so far.  These are
all running on RPMS supplied by Redhat.

Glen Parker
glenebob@nwlink.com


> > I'm curious to know whether PostgreSQL works well with Fedora
> RedHat Linux?
> > If there are any issues, I would like to know about them.