Greetings all,
I am trying to do what should be a simple join but the tables are very
large and it is taking a long, long time. I have the feeling that I
have stuffed up something in the syntax.
Here is what I have:
telemetry=> select (tq1.timestamp = tq2.timestamp) as timestamp,
tq1.value as q1, tq2.value as q2 from cal_quat_1 tq1 inner join
cal_quat_2 as tq2 using (timestamp) where timestamp > '2004-01-12
09:47:56.0000 +0' and timestamp < '2004-01-12 09:50:44.7187 +0' order
by timestamp;
telemetry=> \d cal_quat_1
Table "cal_quat_1"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-----------+--------------------------+-----------
timestamp | timestamp with time zone |
value | double precision |
telemetry=> \d cal_quat_2
Table "cal_quat_2"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-----------+--------------------------+-----------
timestamp | timestamp with time zone |
value | double precision |
My understanding of an inner join is that the query above will restrict
this to finding tq1.timestamp, tq1.value and then move onto t12.value
to search the subset. I have tried this with and without the '=' sign
and it isn't clear if it is making any difference at all. I have not
allowed the query to finish as it seems to take more than 10 minutes.
Both timestamps are indexed and I expect about 150 rows to be returned.
At the end of the day, I have four identical tables of quaternions
(timestamp, value) and I need to extract them all for a range of
timestamps.
Cheers,
Randall