Обсуждение: Psql bug?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

Psql bug?

От
Francisco Reyes
Дата:
Compiled PostgreSQL with gettext support.
Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
<table initials>.

Is this considered a bug? (even if a very minor one at that..).


Re: Psql bug?

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes:
> Compiled PostgreSQL with gettext support.
> Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
> <table initials>.

Works fine for me ...

            regards, tom lane

Re: Psql bug?

От
Francisco Reyes
Дата:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes:
> > Compiled PostgreSQL with gettext support.
> > Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
> > <table initials>.
>
> Works fine for me ...


On a 7.3.4 release Psql?
I was trying first on a 7.3.4 built from ports on FreeBSD.
Just tried a Suse Linux machine that I have access to. Postgres was built
from sources there and I see the same behavior.

For example I have a table called phones
\d ph <tab>
completes name to phones but,


\d+ ph <tab> doesn't complete name.

Re: Psql bug?

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Francisco Reyes <lists@natserv.com> writes:
>>> Table name completion works for \d <table initials>, but doesn't for \d+
>>> <table initials>.
>>
>> Works fine for me ...

> On a 7.3.4 release Psql?

Oh, I was testing 7.4.

            regards, tom lane