Обсуждение: Correct behaviour of "DROP DATABASE"

Hi all,

I was wondering what the expected behaviour of "DROP DATABASE" was.

Basically the problem i have is that when I drop a database it seems
to drop only some of the associated tables.

The tables that it fails to drop are ones with mixed case names.

Is this expected?

Cheers,

Benno

On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 12:11:02PM +1100, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering what the expected behaviour of "DROP DATABASE" was.
>
> Basically the problem i have is that when I drop a database it seems
> to drop only some of the associated tables.
>
> The tables that it fails to drop are ones with mixed case names.

How are you seeing that?
After creating a database and a mixed-case-named table and dropping the
table, I am unable to connect to the (presumably `drop`ped) database.

> Is this expected?

It is certainly not what I would expect, and I cannot imagine it being
designed that way.

Somebody who actually knows what's going on...?

Cheers,
Dan

> Cheers,
>
> Benno

Ben Leslie <benno@sesgroup.net> writes:
> I was wondering what the expected behaviour of "DROP DATABASE" was.

> Basically the problem i have is that when I drop a database it seems
> to drop only some of the associated tables.

That is *real* hard to believe, considering that the entire database
including system catalogs is physically removed (rm -rf no less) by
DROP DATABASE.  There is nothing left in which table names could
appear, mixed-case or otherwise, much less the tables themselves.

What PG version are you running, and exactly what are you doing that
gives you unexpected results?

            regards, tom lane

On Mon, 26 Feb 2001, Tom Lane wrote:

> Ben Leslie <benno@sesgroup.net> writes:
> > I was wondering what the expected behaviour of "DROP DATABASE" was.
>
> > Basically the problem i have is that when I drop a database it seems
> > to drop only some of the associated tables.
>
> That is *real* hard to believe, considering that the entire database
> including system catalogs is physically removed (rm -rf no less) by
> DROP DATABASE.  There is nothing left in which table names could
> appear, mixed-case or otherwise, much less the tables themselves.
>
> What PG version are you running, and exactly what are you doing that
> gives you unexpected results?
>

Sorry, my bad. I managed to screw things up so it looked as though
that is what was happening, but it wasn't.

Apologies for wasting time.

Benno