Обсуждение: Another plpgsql question..
CREATE FUNCTION invoice_payment() RETURNS OPAQUE AS ' BEGIN UPDATE invoice_master SET total = total - NEW.amount,updated = now(), is_paid=(CASE WHEN (total - NEW.amount) = 0.00 THEN ''t'' ELSE ''f'' END) WHERE invoice_id = NEW.invoice_id; RETURN NEW; END; ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; Ok, thanks for the heads up on now().. That works but I add the last part of the query in there and everything but the last part works.. Can I not do CASE WHEN statements in functions like that? That query works when I run it straight from psql but so did the other, so I'm wondering if the same kind of problem is happening here too.. Thanks! -Mitch
"Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net> writes:
> CREATE FUNCTION invoice_payment() RETURNS OPAQUE AS '
> BEGIN
> UPDATE invoice_master SET total = total - NEW.amount,updated = now(),
> is_paid=(CASE WHEN (total - NEW.amount) = 0.00 THEN ''t'' ELSE ''f'' END)
> WHERE invoice_id = NEW.invoice_id;
> RETURN NEW;
> END;
> ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
> Ok, thanks for the heads up on now().. That works but I add the last part of
> the query in there and everything but the last part works.. Can I not do
> CASE WHEN statements in functions like that? That query works when I run it
> straight from psql but so did the other, so I'm wondering if the same kind
> of problem is happening here too..
It looks fine to me. Please define "everything but the last part works"
more precisely.
regards, tom lane
is_paid is never updated... -Mitch ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> To: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net> Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 10:56 AM Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Another plpgsql question.. > "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net> writes: > > CREATE FUNCTION invoice_payment() RETURNS OPAQUE AS ' > > BEGIN > > > UPDATE invoice_master SET total = total - NEW.amount,updated = now(), > > is_paid=(CASE WHEN (total - NEW.amount) = 0.00 THEN ''t'' ELSE ''f'' END) > > WHERE invoice_id = NEW.invoice_id; > > > RETURN NEW; > > > END; > > ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; > > > Ok, thanks for the heads up on now().. That works but I add the last part of > > the query in there and everything but the last part works.. Can I not do > > CASE WHEN statements in functions like that? That query works when I run it > > straight from psql but so did the other, so I'm wondering if the same kind > > of problem is happening here too.. > > It looks fine to me. Please define "everything but the last part works" > more precisely. > > regards, tom lane >
"Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net> writes:
> is_paid is never updated...
It's not possible that is_paid is never updated; that command *will*
replace the total, updated, and is_paid columns with *something*.
It may be that in the cases you've checked, it gets updated to the
same value it had before. That's why I want to see the test cases.
regards, tom lane
Ok, it appears now I have an error.. Unless I'm going crazy, this started
after I had to do a restore because of one of those cache lookup errors.. I
changed nothing, still, this is what I get..
CREATE FUNCTION invoice_payment() RETURNS OPAQUE AS '
BEGIN
UPDATE invoice_master SET total = total - NEW.amount,updated = now(),
is_paid=(CASE WHEN (total - NEW.amount) = 0.00 THEN ''t'' ELSE ''f'' END)
WHERE invoice_id = NEW.invoice_id;
RETURN NEW;
END;
' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql';
Now I get
brw=# INSERT into invoice_payments VALUES
(1,1000,'now',100,'now',100,1,1,150.00);
ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8'
You will have to retype this query using an explicit cast
DEBUG: Last error occured while executing PL/pgSQL function invoice_payment
DEBUG: line 2 at SQL statement
ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8'
You will have to retype this query using an explicit cast
brw=#
--- amount and total are both numeric(9,2), I've tried casting everything
(total,amount and 0.00) to float and everything to numeric with the same
error popping up.. What needs casting here?
I can determine if an invoice has been paid or not a number of ways, really
what I should do there is NEW.amount >= total -- I tried and got the above
error again..
Thanks!
-Mitch
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Another plpgsql question..
> "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net> writes:
> > is_paid is never updated...
>
> It's not possible that is_paid is never updated; that command *will*
> replace the total, updated, and is_paid columns with *something*.
> It may be that in the cases you've checked, it gets updated to the
> same value it had before. That's why I want to see the test cases.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
"Mitch Vincent" <mitch@venux.net> writes:
> ERROR: Unable to identify an operator '=' for types 'numeric' and 'float8'
> You will have to retype this query using an explicit cast
> --- amount and total are both numeric(9,2),
Hm, then "(total - NEW.amount) = 0.00::numeric" should work, although
I don't see why you don't just write it as "total = NEW.amount".
regards, tom lane