Обсуждение: pgsql: Improve parser's and planner's handling of set-returning functio

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка

pgsql: Improve parser's and planner's handling of set-returning functio

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Improve parser's and planner's handling of set-returning functions.

Teach the parser to reject misplaced set-returning functions during parse
analysis using p_expr_kind, in much the same way as we do for aggregates
and window functions (cf commit eaccfded9).  While this isn't complete
(it misses nesting-based restrictions), it's much better than the previous
error reporting for such cases, and it allows elimination of assorted
ad-hoc expression_returns_set() error checks.  We could add nesting checks
later if it seems important to catch all cases at parse time.

There is one case the parser will now throw error for although previous
versions allowed it, which is SRFs in the tlist of an UPDATE.  That never
behaved sensibly (since it's ill-defined which generated row should be
used to perform the update) and it's hard to see why it should not be
treated as an error.  It's a release-note-worthy change though.

Also, add a new Query field hasTargetSRFs reporting whether there are
any SRFs in the targetlist (including GROUP BY/ORDER BY expressions).
The parser can now set that basically for free during parse analysis,
and we can use it in a number of places to avoid expression_returns_set
searches.  (There will be more such checks soon.)  In some places, this
allows decontorting the logic since it's no longer expensive to check for
SRFs in the tlist --- so I made the checks parallel to the handling of
hasAggs/hasWindowFuncs wherever it seemed appropriate.

catversion bump because adding a Query field changes stored rules.

Andres Freund and Tom Lane

Discussion: <24639.1473782855@sss.pgh.pa.us>

Branch
------
master

Details
-------
http://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/a4c35ea1c2f05dd5b56739fcd0dc36a4870ea0c0

Modified Files
--------------
src/backend/catalog/heap.c                |   9 +-
src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c             |   1 +
src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c            |   1 +
src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c              |   1 +
src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c             |   1 +
src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c     |   6 +-
src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c |   7 +-
src/backend/optimizer/plan/planner.c      |  20 ++--
src/backend/optimizer/plan/subselect.c    |  10 +-
src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepjointree.c |  18 +---
src/backend/optimizer/util/clauses.c      |  17 ++--
src/backend/parser/analyze.c              |   7 +-
src/backend/parser/parse_func.c           | 148 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
src/backend/parser/parse_oper.c           |   4 +
src/backend/parser/parse_utilcmd.c        |  20 +---
src/backend/rewrite/rewriteHandler.c      |   2 +-
src/include/catalog/catversion.h          |   2 +-
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h            |   1 +
src/include/parser/parse_func.h           |   2 +
src/include/parser/parse_node.h           |   3 +-
src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_exec.c              |   1 +
src/test/regress/expected/tsrf.out        |  13 ++-
src/test/regress/sql/tsrf.sql             |   4 +-
23 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)


Re: pgsql: Improve parser's and planner's handling of set-returning functio

От
Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:54 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> There is one case the parser will now throw error for although previous
> versions allowed it, which is SRFs in the tlist of an UPDATE.  That never
> behaved sensibly (since it's ill-defined which generated row should be
> used to perform the update) and it's hard to see why it should not be
> treated as an error.  It's a release-note-worthy change though.

There is a reference to this right at the end of the executor README
that was missed.


--
Peter Geoghegan


Re: pgsql: Improve parser's and planner's handling of set-returning functio

От
Tom Lane
Дата:
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes:
> There is a reference to this right at the end of the executor README
> that was missed.

Yeah, Andres already reminded me ;-).  Fixed.

            regards, tom lane