Обсуждение: pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't WAL-logged.
pgsql: Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't WAL-logged.
От
tgl@svr1.postgresql.org (Tom Lane)
Дата:
Log Message: ----------- Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't WAL-logged. Modified Files: -------------- pgsql/doc/src/sgml: backup.sgml (r2.65 -> r2.66) (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml.diff?r1=2.65&r2=2.66)
Don't forget the line in the GiST docs that says basically that WAL logging is a SMOP: http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/limitations.html Chris Tom Lane wrote: > Log Message: > ----------- > Update text that stated GiST indexes aren't WAL-logged. > > Modified Files: > -------------- > pgsql/doc/src/sgml: > backup.sgml (r2.65 -> r2.66) > (http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/backup.sgml.diff?r1=2.65&r2=2.66) > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > Don't forget the line in the GiST docs that says basically that WAL > logging is a SMOP: > http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/limitations.html Ah, I did forget that one. Thanks. regards, tom lane
You could also mention under limitations that it's not NULL-safe perhaps. Chris Tom Lane wrote: > Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > >>Don't forget the line in the GiST docs that says basically that WAL >>logging is a SMOP: >>http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/limitations.html > > > Ah, I did forget that one. Thanks. > > regards, tom lane